On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Michael Grosberg
grosberg.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the spacing calculation does not take into effect the aspect ratio
correctly, and acts as if the longest axis is the base length from which
spacing
is derived, while it should be, I believe, the short axis that affects the
spacing.
this is a long standing issue, that I do plan to look into at some
point. There are some complications I believe, relating to knowing the
effect that dynamics are going to have on shape and size of the brush.
The same issue manifests with rotation.
Also, The aspect ratio slider is not very intuitive - would it be possible
to have 0 as the default state (height = width), with, say negative numbers
for scaling height and positive for scaling width? I know it makes no sense
mathematically, but visually it would help to have the slider centered for
zero distortion and have the same length on either side for changing the
aspect
ratio.
This change is already commited to git. Has been for a week or so, the
repository must be be behind a bit.
--
--Alexia
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
