Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: 16 new brushes for the GIMP
On 31 Oct 2003, at 2:59, Tor Lillqvist wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on gimpwin-users: [...] I just wanted to let everyone know that I've created another 16 custom brushes for GIMP (in addition to the initial 16 I offered a few days ago). I would like to create about 10-15 per day but I'm running out of copyright- free photo resources. I've already been to gimp-savvy. Does anyone know of other resources where copyright-free or GPL'd photo's can be found?. Try the sites listed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain_image_resources. -- branko collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: 16 new brushes for the GIMP
Hi, Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on gimpwin-users: [...] If you are involved in the GIMP v1.3/2.0 project (ie; the new GIMP), please feel free to include my custom brushes (or any of my other offerings) with your work (they are GPL'd). http://www.tuxfiles.com/yourgimp/brushes/tuxfiles_brushes/ I would appreciate if someone could evaluate the quality of these brushes and report back here. We could need a better set of default brushes. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: 16 new brushes for the GIMP
On 31 Oct 2003 17:26:46 +0100 Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on gimpwin-users: [...] If you are involved in the GIMP v1.3/2.0 project (ie; the new GIMP), please feel free to include my custom brushes (or any of my other offerings) with your work (they are GPL'd). http://www.tuxfiles.com/yourgimp/brushes/tuxfiles_brushes/ I would appreciate if someone could evaluate the quality of these brushes and report back here. We could need a better set of default brushes. I would call them a Boutique collection of brushes and not really a default set. They all appear to be called Pasted Layer. It appears that when you modify the name of a .gbr file, the name has to be exactly the same number of characters as the original name (Pasted Layer ie 12) otherwise you get a file has been truncated error Anyway, most of them are pretty good. Owen -- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: 16 new brushes for the GIMP
Owen writes: Anyway, most of them are pretty good. but for this kind of images, image pipes (.gih brushes) would be even better. (each image pipe brush containig a set of related images, for instance diffferent kinds of fruit, different size and colour leaves, etc.) toad_walker said he would try creating such brushes too. --tml ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: 16 new brushes for the GIMP
Hi, Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would call them a Boutique collection of brushes and not really a default set. The question was whether these brushes would be a useful addition to the default set. Brush categories will have to wait till 2.2 probably; see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119874 They all appear to be called Pasted Layer. It appears that when you modify the name of a .gbr file, the name has to be exactly the same number of characters as the original name (Pasted Layer ie 12) otherwise you get a file has been truncated error The binary brush format is not supposed to be edited manually. To change a brush's name, open the brush file in GIMP, edit the layer name and save it again. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
