On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:36:09PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 13:07 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
So another idea is to persuade Shawn to move everything gimp.org to
another server (perhaps somewhere in gnome.org/RedHat's colo to take
advantage of their sysadmin
Hi,
Manish Singh a écrit :
I think policing it at all is silly.
That's unacceptable. And it's not your decision to make.
One really should evaluate emails on the actual *content*, and
not what the From address says. There are several active contributors
who do not use gimp.org addresses,
Hi Yosh,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 01:50 -0700, Manish Singh wrote:
One really should evaluate emails on the actual *content*, and
not what the From address says. There are several active contributors
who do not use gimp.org addresses, assuming their comments should have
less weight is rather
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:31:56PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
I am not really willing to ignore this issue any longer. I have had
several reports from people who received mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that
can be described as very irritating, to say the least. I think that we
can not any
On 9/28/06, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't get where the expectation that postings from gimp.org addressesshould be considered as anything but the individual _expression_ of theauthor. Expecting a volunteer organization to have a rigid public face
is ridiculous.When I initially
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 11:15 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
cheekyWe could rename the GIMP to something else like GNU masterstroke
That was probably the most stupid direction that you could have steered
this discussion into. Thanks for ruining an effort to actually discuss a
problem that we
Hi Sven,
Sven Neumann a écrit :
That was probably the most stupid direction that you could have steered
this discussion into. Thanks for ruining an effort to actually discuss a
problem that we seem unable to deal with.
Right - because otherwise we would surely have dealt with the problem.
Following up to myself, with a minor correction:
Dave Neary a écrit :
But that would need the domain owner (yosh) to make the
change, and that's not going to happen soon.
The domain is owned by Shawn Amundson (snorfle), but he hasn't been
involved in the GIMP for a long time and yosh is the
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 13:07 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
So another idea is to persuade Shawn to move everything gimp.org to
another server (perhaps somewhere in gnome.org/RedHat's colo to take
advantage of their sysadmin team?), update the DNS records and move on
with our lives with new
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:37:02 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point here is that Carol is continuously abusing her email address.
I have asked her several times not to use it any longer but she ignored
this request and continues to send mails as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm amazed
Today GIMP for Windows is in the fifth place among the most downloaded
applications from sourceforge.net. So Gimp is a real brand name ;).
That way, gimp.org would become an irrelevant historical artifact. And
one of the most common complaints from our American users (for whom the
GIMP means
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it is useful to have project adresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
whatever to know you are dealing with core member of the project.
Do I really know this from the mail address? Especially for a large company
like redhat, mail adresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo
