On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:46:30 -0400, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2003-06-17 at 1448.17 +0200, Rapha?l Quinet typed this: > [...] > > Anyway, I think that it is better to discuss this on the gimp-web list, > > so I will post a more detailled reply to your message on that list. > > > well, this seems like anarchy to me. perhaps i should just stop mucking > around with it and see what happens to it. > > mutiny on the bounty? > > Rapha?l, you can call it volunteering or mutiny. i will only accept one > of the these two descriptions of this totally audacious email you are > sending lately.
Woah! I didn't mean to offend you. And this is certainly not a mutiny or anarchy or whatever. Regarding Netscape 4, I was just repeating what I wrote a while ago on the gimp-web list. I pointed out some problems and suggested a way to solve them (using tables instead of CSS positioning). So this problem is not new and you should not be offended by that. I also mentioned in my last message that I would like to get more information about what you plan to do with wilber because your announcement came as a surprise, did not explain what was planned and sounded like wilber would disapear on very short notice. I am sorry if the tone of my message has offended you, as that was not my intention. Maybe I wrote my first message a bit too quickly because I was both surprised and worried. > do i need to see about giving you permission to commit to the gnomecvs > server so this mutiny can be more than just talk? I have commit access to gnomecvs since a while. And I would certainly be glad to contribute to the gimp-web module, if you are not afraid of letting me change things. As promised, I have posted a more detailled reply to both of your messages (you replied twice to the same message) to the gimp-web list. It contains a paragraph in which I explain some of the things I would like to update in order to support older browsers. I have also included some screenshots of mmmaybe.gimp.org viewed in Netscape 4.79 (see http://www.gimp.org/~raphael/web-gimp/). I am sorry that it took me a bit longer than expected to post my reply, but I could only write it during breaks at work and it took me so long that I decided to finish it after work. I suggest that we continue this discussion on the gimp-web list because it is a bit off-topic for the developers' list. -Raphaël _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
