Re: [Gimp-developer] Requesting advice for solving bug #325564
Hi, On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 09:08 -0500, Christopher Curtis wrote: If this change is implemented in GEGL, does that mean it will make it into 2.6? Probably not as it seems rather unlikely that we will start to use GEGL for the layer modes in 2.6 already. If not, wouldn't it make more sense to allow Jesper to improve 2.6, then port it to GEGL (and remove the non-CMS aware version)? We don't want the core to depend on lcms. Also there are some other problems here, such as that we can not change a layer mode as that would break backwards compatibility. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Requesting advice for solving bug #325564
Hi, On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 20:15 +0100, Jesper de Jong wrote: I have been looking into bug #325564 the past few days and I know how this should be solved, and I'm looking for advice on how best to implement this in GIMP. The best thing you can do at this point is to look at GEGL and make sure that it does these things right and that all the layer modes we need are made available as GEGL operators. The sooner this happens the sooner we can switch to GEGL and get all this fixed. I don't think it makes sense to even attempt to fix it in GIMP. It would be pretty much a waste of time to work on this legacy code that is scheduled for removal. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
