Re: [Gimp-developer] Two new build bugs

2007-06-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 01:53 -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: With these bug fixes going in, not only is it now possible to build GIMP from a clean/read-only SVN tree (i.e. only touched with ./autogen.sh), make distcheck is working too. Well, almost, but it's very nearly there.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Two new build bugs

2007-06-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:51 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: This will all help to keep generated files out of a version-controlled working source tree. (The fewer question marks you get from svn stat, the better.) Actually, now that we accepted some of the proposed changes, building

Re: [Gimp-developer] Two new build bugs

2007-06-08 Thread Daniel Richard G.
On Fri, 2007 Jun 08 21:10:22 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Actually, now that we accepted some of the proposed changes, building outside the source directory is somewhat broken. We have generated files that are intentionally kept under version control. If you build with srcdir != builddir and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Two new build bugs

2007-06-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 16:10 -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: What is the intention behind version-controlling those files? I didn't notice anything particularly painful to generate. Most of these files are in SVN because they contain translatable strings. The message catalogs are built

Re: [Gimp-developer] Two new build bugs

2007-06-07 Thread Daniel Richard G.
With these bug fixes going in, not only is it now possible to build GIMP from a clean/read-only SVN tree (i.e. only touched with ./autogen.sh), make distcheck is working too. Well, almost, but it's very nearly there. Fixes for make dist from a clean/ro SVN tree