On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:21:56AM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> I expect that Debian (and other distributions) will ship a copy of the
> print plugin and the relevant shared library as separate packages,
> with appropriate dependencies between them. This means that the only
> people who will h
On Wednesday, 21 Feb 2001, Roger Leigh wrote:
> [sensible things]
That sounds pretty sane.
I expect that Debian (and other distributions) will ship a copy of the
print plugin and the relevant shared library as separate packages,
with appropriate dependencies between them. This means that the o
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:13:28PM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 Feb 2001, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> > This would total four (libgimpprint and associated tests, the
> > plugin, the CUPS driver, and the Ghostscript driver), plus possibly
> > other packages for things like Debian an
Austin Donnelly wrote:
> ...
> Well, maybe just 3:
> libgimpprint
> print plugin (both of these manually imported to gimp cvs)
> CPUS + Ghostscript drivers
The CUPS and Ghostscript drivers shouldn't be combined... It
would be pretty easy to add the CUPS driver to the main CUPS
distribution
On Tuesday, 20 Feb 2001, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:30:56 +
>From: Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I think the easiest thing is to have the version in CVS (and gimp
>snapshots) to include the code for the shared library, and an
>integrated b
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:30:56 +
From: Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think the easiest thing is to have the version in CVS (and gimp
snapshots) to include the code for the shared library, and an
integrated build system. I'd even go so far to say that the plugin
sho
On Saturday, 17 Feb 2001, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> This raises questions of how to package it with the
> Gimp. The Gimp could certainly distribute the whole package with it,
> but it's quite large. It could also be treated like JPEG and only
> built if the underlying libgimpprint exists on the
