Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-08-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 13:10 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: What is the migration time? You would have to deal with this on each and every start of GIMP. System resources may have changed, due to a minor or micro GIMP update or because the system maintainer added or removed resource

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-08-03 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 08/03/2009 09:33 PM, Sven Neumann wrote: GIMP has done it the way you proposed in the past and copied system resources to the user directory. This was ugly and caused lots of grief. Eventually we got rid of this mess and now you are proposing to undo this work and to reintroduce this

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-29 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 20:21 +0930, David Gowers wrote: [...] You can already do that for any circle brush. The attribute is called 'Hardness' We would not seriously consider such a level of reduction because it's bad for usability -- it's much more painful for the user to adjust a slider

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-29 Thread Jason van Gumster
David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com wrote: You can already do that for any circle brush. The attribute is called 'Hardness' Thanks for pointing this out. I'd overlooked that. We would not seriously consider such a level of reduction because it's bad for usability -- it's much more painful for

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-29 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:18 +0930, David Gowers wrote: Hmm, I tend to forget that there are people who use mice for general GIMP work. I can see how this could actually save time then, if you only ever use Eraser with one or two different fixed brushes instead of switching a lot. for what

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-28 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/28/2009 03:04 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: Getting back to the start of this discussion -- I am in talks with the new mantainer of a very popular brazillian GIMP comunity portal this week (Guilherme coordinating www.ogimp.com.br with ~20.000 unique visitors a day)-- he has resources of

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-28 Thread Jason van Gumster
Sparr spa...@gmail.com wrote: Circle and Fuzzy Circle should be two brushes. I've been following this conversation with a bit of interest, but I've noticed that a lot of discussion has echoed this sentiment. Why should there be two circle brushes? Couldn't there be a single circular brush with

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-28 Thread David Gowers
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jason van Gumster ja...@handturkeystudios.com wrote: Sparr spa...@gmail.com wrote: Circle and Fuzzy Circle should be two brushes. I've been following this conversation with a bit of interest, but I've noticed that a lot of discussion has echoed this

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-27 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Getting back to the start of this discussion -- I am in talks with the new mantainer of a very popular brazillian GIMP comunity portal this week (Guilherme coordinating www.ogimp.com.br with ~20.000 unique visitors a day)-- he has resources of his own which could be made available eitehr in

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-27 Thread Sparr
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:  * Add larger variants of the circle and fuzzy circle    brushes, say 50, 100, 250 and 500 px I really wish the brush system was improved to make this unneccessary. We should be able to smoothly scale vector-ish brushes

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 22:07 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: So, we can only add resources and tags that have never shipped with a previous version of GIMP to the migrated user dir. Finding this set of resources and tags is just a matter of maintaining data sets with resources and tags

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-24 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/24/2009 09:06 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 22:07 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: So, we can only add resources and tags that have never shipped with a previous version of GIMP to the migrated user dir. Finding this set of resources and tags is just a matter of

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 10:33 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: Whatever approach we take will require some dedicated code for managing system/default resources. My conclusion is that being forced to deal with this at migration time is less messy and keeps problems more local than

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-24 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/24/2009 12:28 PM, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 10:33 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: Whatever approach we take will require some dedicated code for managing system/default resources. My conclusion is that being forced to deal with this at migration time is less messy

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-24 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/24/2009 01:10 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: As convinced you are that your approach is better than mine, I'm equally convinced my approach is better then yours. I would like to add that if the ongoing brush dynamics and tool options redesign discussions end with a solution where editing of

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-24 Thread Alexia Death
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/24/2009 01:10 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: As convinced you are that your approach is better than mine, I'm equally convinced my approach is better then yours. I would like to add that if the ongoing brush

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-24 Thread yahvuu
hi, from a long-term perspective, i expect resources to be shared easily 'on the cloud', with each resource item identified by a GUID. Then, the read-only system files are just a local cache of some of the available resources on the internet. Also from this perspective, it becomes strange to

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-24 Thread Aurimas Juška
hi, On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Alexia Deathalexiade...@gmail.com wrote: Actually, this is the key point of this discussion and IMHO the RIGHT WAY(TM) to solve this. Editing resources during use should not require write access. Saving the changes should. Use tweaking should be a different

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-24 Thread Brian Allen Vanderburg II
Aurimas Juška wrote: Let me extend your idea a bit. Every time selecting a resource, a copy of it could be created (in memory, not on physical file). User could edit resource in any way she likes without affecting originally selected resources. GIMP could actually maintain a

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-23 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:48 AM, David Gowers wrote: (Speaking of which, the fact that tools presets don't save/restore scale value isn't helpful either.) AFAICS that isn't a generally true fact. Works for me -- I just checked by choosing 1.06, saving that as a preset, setting it to 0.01

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 01:16 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: Another reason is that it is not reasonable to duplicate the system resources in the folders of all users. How exactly is this unreasonable in 2009? Compared to the amount of images we can expect a user to have based on our

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-23 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/23/2009 06:37 PM, Sven Neumann wrote: I don't see how anything that was unreasonable some years ago becomes reasonable in 2009. It was equally reasonable also some years ago. My point was that we are long past the time when hard disk space was an issue. Another reason is that it

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Alexia Death
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 00:37:43 Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 18:33 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: I d'be against the removal of the vintage pixmaped brushes. Why? Tell us a good reason then why we should keep them. Ive done a few quite nice wallpapers with just dynamics

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/20/2009 06:43 AM, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, With the integration of tagging support in GIMP we have a mechanism that allows us to organize resources (brushes, patterns, palettes, and gradients). This

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Steren
Indeed, they are good examples. For me, the thing is : why these examples ? To give examples doesn't mean not to justify them. A justification could be the need of the users, if after a study it appears that the color Brush the most relevant to provide by default is a Pepper, I would understand.

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/20/2009 10:29 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: * Add larger variants of the circle and fuzzy circle brushes, say 50, 100, 250 and 500 px The prerequisite for this is GIMP not playing a dying turtle that climbs up to

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Alexia Death
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.comwrote: On 07/20/2009 10:29 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: * Add larger variants of the circle and fuzzy circle brushes, say 50, 100, 250 and 500 px The

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/20/2009 11:10 AM, Alexia Death wrote: * Add larger variants of the circle and fuzzy circle Please no, there's too many round brushes already and bigger ones would look exactly the same and add confusion. There should not be 2 brushes that look to be the same shape in the default set.

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/20/2009 03:28 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: Hi, With the integration of tagging support in GIMP we have a mechanism that allows us to organize resources (brushes, patterns, palettes, and gradients). This enables us to add a

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/20/2009 06:19 PM, Emil Assarsson wrote: What I really miss is to be able to remove brushes that I don't need and sort/group the ones I use a lot. Maybe it would be better that most - if not all - of the brushes where copied to the users profile as a default instead of being static. I

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread SHIRAKAWA Akira
Martin Nordholts wrote: I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What do you think Regarding this, as an user (and not a programmer),

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/22/2009 06:50 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: Now, my tagging proposal would just keep then available for people and scritps alike, while making then 100% non-obtrusive, - I don' t understand why you haven't commented on that. I think your suggestion to use tags to mark resources as

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Jon Senior
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:03:31 +0200 Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote: I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What do you think

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/22/2009 12:18 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote: Martin Nordholts wrote: I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What do you think

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: Easy enough, just unset the 'global-brush' property. I am not sure though if that would make a good default for the average user. So far I only heard from users thanks, but why is it not by default? :) Alexandre

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Fredrik Alströmer
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 14:12, Alexandre Prokoudinealexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: Easy enough, just unset the 'global-brush' property. I am not sure though if that would make a good default for the average user. So far I only heard

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
2009/7/22 Fredrik Alströmer wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 14:12, Alexandre Prokoudinealexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: Easy enough, just unset the 'global-brush' property. I am not sure though if that would make a good default for

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread David Gowers
2009/7/22 Fredrik Alströmer r...@excu.se On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 14:12, Alexandre Prokoudinealexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: Easy enough, just unset the 'global-brush' property. I am not sure though if that would make a good

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/20/2009 12:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions on adjustments and additions to the default set of GIMP resources? Thanks for the great feedback everyone. Summing it up, these are the current desired adjustments to the default set of resources. We should: *

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
2009/7/22 David Gowers wrote: tools. When I think about it, I wonder whether such users ever get to using GIMP with any level of frequency or intensity, as IMO with the global-brush option off Don't wonder -- they do. And I do too :) (Speaking of which, the fact that tools presets don't

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Cracauer
Martin Nordholts wrote on Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:05:38PM +0200: On 07/20/2009 12:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions on adjustments and additions to the default set of GIMP resources? Thanks for the great feedback everyone. Summing it up, these are the

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/22/2009 03:28 PM, Martin Cracauer wrote: Speaking of brushes - brush rotation which currently requires a plugin (which is a little painful to use as it isn't interactive) is high on my wishlist. Brush rotation is implemented in git master and will be part of GIMP 2.7.0. / Martin

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com (2009-07-22 at 1218.30 +0200): Martin Nordholts wrote: I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 23:54 +0200, GSR - FR wrote: I avoid scale whenever I can, so for vector brushes I just use the brush editor. Scaling a vector brush from the tool options is equivalent, at least from an implementation point of view, to changing its size in the brush editor. Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 18:53 -0400, Rob Antonishen wrote: One reason to keep some image hose brushes in the default set is just to demonstrate that gimp supports them! I participate in a web forum for amateur cartography, and one of the most common requests is how to use tubes with

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:10 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: On 07/20/2009 06:19 PM, Emil Assarsson wrote: What I really miss is to be able to remove brushes that I don't need and sort/group the ones I use a lot. Maybe it would be better that most - if not all - of the brushes where

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, s...@gimp.org (2009-07-23 at 0031.55 +0200): On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 23:54 +0200, GSR - FR wrote: I avoid scale whenever I can, so for vector brushes I just use the brush editor. Scaling a vector brush from the tool options is equivalent, at least from an implementation point of view, to

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/23/2009 12:39 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:10 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: On 07/20/2009 06:19 PM, Emil Assarsson wrote: What I really miss is to be able to remove brushes that I don't need and sort/group the ones I use a lot. Maybe it would be better that

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 00:51 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: We could either introduce a complex system to allow the user to delete system resources, or we could make it simple for ourselves and the user and just initialize the user dir with a set of default resources. I don't

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 00:48 +0200, GSR - FR wrote: The points are the separate GUI, the mental maths required or the try and error workflow until you find the right size for brush changes, which are the issues the user has to cope with; versus a(n unified) pixel size control (currently

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/23/2009 12:56 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 00:51 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: We could either introduce a complex system to allow the user to delete system resources, or we could make it simple for ourselves and the user and just initialize the user dir with a

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-22 Thread David Gowers
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/7/22 David Gowers wrote: tools. When I think about it, I wonder whether such users ever get to using GIMP with any level of frequency or intensity, as IMO with the global-brush option off

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-21 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Monday 20 July 2009, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 00:36 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: * Try to get rid of the Pepper, Sparks and Vine brushes in a backwards compatible way You can just remove those if we agree that they are not useful. I doubt that any script

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 18:33 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: I d'be against the removal of the vintage pixmaped brushes. Why? Tell us a good reason then why we should keep them. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-21 Thread Rob Antonishen
One reason to keep some image hose brushes in the default set is just to demonstrate that gimp supports them! I participate in a web forum for amateur cartography, and one of the most common requests is how to use tubes with photoshop. Most are extremely impressed that this capability exists in

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-21 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Sven Neumann wrote: Why? Tell us a good reason then why we should keep them. On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Rob Antonishen wrote: One reason to keep some image hose brushes in the default set is just to demonstrate that gimp supports them! I participate in a web forum for

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:  * Add larger variants of the circle and fuzzy circle    brushes, say 50, 100, 250 and 500 px The prerequisite for this is GIMP not playing a dying turtle that climbs up to Kilimanjaro top while drawing with a 200+ px brush :) Alexandre

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Alexia Death
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I think we at least should: * Add larger variants of the circle and fuzzy circle brushes, say 50, 100, 250 and 500 px Please no, there's too many round brushes already and bigger ones would look exactly the

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Alexia Death wrote: Default set of resources should include some tool presets, like some common aspect ratio fixed presets(2:3, 3:4) for crop tool and dynamics enabled presets for the paint tools using default resources set. So we are back to the topic of GIMP

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Alexia Death
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Alexia Death wrote: Default set of resources should include some tool presets, like some common aspect ratio fixed presets(2:3, 3:4) for crop tool and dynamics

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Rob Antonishen
I have not played extensively with a release supporting tagging so forgive this possible trivial questions. Is the tagging data stored in the resource file itself as metadata or in some corresponding file or files? Is it possible to pre-tag the items in a set of resources (say a brush set) that

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/20/2009 02:40 PM, Rob Antonishen wrote: Is the tagging data stored in the resource file itself as metadata or in some corresponding file or files? The tags are stored externally in ~/.gimp-2.7/tags.xml Is it possible to pre-tag the items in a set of resources (say a brush set) that can

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread saulgoode
Martin Nordholts wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions on adjustments and additions to the default set of GIMP resources? I would propose having a hard-edged, foreground color to background color gradient. Such a gradient can be useful for creating circles, boxes, blinds, bullseyes, and

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: Hi, With the integration of tagging support in GIMP we have a mechanism that allows us to organize resources (brushes, patterns, palettes, and gradients). This enables us to add a bigger set of default resources. What I'd love to see

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Guillermo Espertino
I'd really love to see GIMP Paint Studio presets as default too. That would make possible to get rid of some default brushes that really don't cut. About the large size brushes, I also agree. I think that several small round brushes should be removed (since brush scaling covers that need). We have

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Emil Assarsson
What I really miss is to be able to remove brushes that I don't need and sort/group the ones I use a lot. Maybe it would be better that most - if not all - of the brushes where copied to the users profile as a default instead of being static. This also would invite the user to modify her/his own

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Rob Antonishen
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Emil Assarsson wrote: What I really miss is to be able to remove brushes that I don't need and sort/group the ones I use a lot. There is he GURM python plugin which works quite well for this: http://registry.gimp.org/node/13473 -Rob A

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, ense...@gmail.com (2009-07-20 at 0036.20 +0200): [...] gradients). This enables us to add a bigger set of default resources. Here you say bigger. [...] A few things are clear: * The new default resources must fit the product vision [1] Does that leave things like Gimp Paint Studio

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 00:36 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: * Try to get rid of the Pepper, Sparks and Vine brushes in a backwards compatible way You can just remove those if we agree that they are not useful. I doubt that any script out there actually uses them. This is different

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 17:28 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: What I'd love to see instead/alongside is sane defaults. While Pencil is a brush based tool, users do not actually expect it to behave like a brush. But right now Pencil and Brush use same brush by default: Circle Fuzzy (19),

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-19 Thread SHIRAKAWA Akira
Martin Nordholts wrote: [cut] Does anyone have any suggestions on adjustments and additions to the default set of GIMP resources? I have a few suggestions as a creative/artistic user which uses GIMP mainly with a pen tablet (as probably any other people who is serious into raster graphic

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-19 Thread Laxminarayan Kamath
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, With the integration of tagging support in GIMP we have a mechanism that allows us to organize resources (brushes, patterns, palettes, and gradients). This enables us to add a bigger set of default resources. I