On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Brian Vanderburg II
brianvanderbu...@aim.com wrote:
Velocity - I may consider 10 pix/sec slow (0) and 100 pix/sec fast (1)
while someone else may consider 50 pix/sec slow and 500 pix/sec fast.
This is slightly compilcated as velocity is purely a derivative value
On 09/15/2011 03:15 AM, Alexia Death wrote:
Inputs that mapping does not make sense:
Direction (0-1 = 0-360 deg)
Random
Doesn't make sense how? Look at GPS. Random is made rather good use of
in some presets and direction has its uses as well.
What I mean is it doesn't make sense for the
I would second this as a useful idea.
--
Kind Regards,
Vincent Ardern
-Original Message-
From: Brian Vanderburg II brianvanderbu...@aim.com
Sender: gimp-developer-boun...@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:49:34
To: GIMP Developers Listgimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
2010/10/10 Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:24 +0200, Olivier wrote:
There are no longer brush tool artefacts on the canvas, which is very
good. Unfortunately, and maybe this is because of the repair, the
brush tools are now very slow.
Olivier, please, this is ongoing
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Olivier oleca...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't really know what is the best way to signal problems without
bothering the developers: the gimp-developer list, the IRC channel, or
bugzilla ?
IF it's git and the issue just appeared, checking in at IRC is best
and
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:24 +0200, Olivier wrote:
There are no longer brush tool artefacts on the canvas, which is very
good. Unfortunately, and maybe this is because of the repair, the
brush tools are now very slow.
Olivier, please, this is ongoing development. And yes, we are using the
On Friday, July 09, 2010 23:38:53 LightningIsMyName wrote:
Suggestions:
1. Change the default brush dynamics to mimic the default settings in
2.6 (Pressure mapped to Opacity, and disabling all the other inputs).
Simply disabling all the dynamics by default (or more precisely,
setting them to
On Thursday 12 February 2009 22:10:14 Egor Voznessenski wrote:
-- EV --
This mail is supposed to mean what? What wheel?
-- Alexia
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Brian Allen Vanderburg II wrote:
Anyhow I though about some more ideas for a brush dynamics system, these
are just some ideas I doubt I could do much with them myself though but
I may try to familiarize myself with the code anyhow.
Hi and thanks for the suggestions! They are however not
On Saturday 25 October 2008 11:02:57 Brian Allen Vanderburg II wrote:
Anyhow I though about some more ideas for a brush dynamics system, these
are just some ideas I doubt I could do much with them myself though but
I may try to familiarize myself with the code anyhow.
Most of what you have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 25 October 2008 11:02:57 Brian Allen Vanderburg II wrote:
Anyhow I though about some more ideas for a brush dynamics system, these
are just some ideas I doubt I could do much with them myself though but
I may try to familiarize myself with the code
On 8/19/07, M Tieleman wrote:
I'm rather curious, is a brush manager in the works?
AFAIK, no. Feel free to write it after 2.4 :)
There is an open source (hosted by SourceForge) brush manager for
The-Application-I-May-Not-Name-Here, so you have something to look at.
Alexandre
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:36:14 +0200
M Tieleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've googled quite a bit, and can't find a thing about brush
management, well, rather a brush manager for the gimp above version
2.2 (which includes 2.4)
I'm rather curious, is a brush manager in the works? that would be a
Accessing the size and rotate settings through the pdb would be great,
here is a lot of ways that I would end up using it...
I have a few scripts where I have needed to change rotation and size of
a brush... What I've ended up doing is creating a new layer, paint one
instance at x,y, and then
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 15:16 +0200, Van Aarde Krynauw wrote:
Greetings,
I'm glad to see that GIMP is incorporating a brush scaling mechanism.
I've been waiting for a long time for something like this! Although,
it would be nice if the brush can scale up and down, instead of simply
scaling
On Thursday 15 March 2007 07:22, jbaker wrote:
Thanks for all the work on this one, it works great...
I was just curious if there are any plans add the ability to scale
and rotate the standard brushes with python ? I did a quick search
in the procedure browser but didn't see anything except
2007 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Brush organization
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 15:28 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked this on the Gimp-Win mailing list and no one there knew a way
of doing it so: Is there any way to put Gimp brushes into
subcategories (like subdirectories) so
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 15:28 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked this on the Gimp-Win mailing list and no one there knew a way
of doing it so: Is there any way to put Gimp brushes into
subcategories (like subdirectories) so that if I add a bunch of
brushes I don't have to scroll
Hi,
Laxminarayan Ammembal Kamath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
another idea
Not a new one though. This has been suggested before. There is just no
infrastructure for these kind of plug-ins/extensions. We plan to have
it at some point in time but so far no work is being done to make this
happen.
Hi,
Nasim Shamlou A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure if it's too late to suggest this change to the coming
stable version of The Gimp or not, but I've been thinking that it would
be nice if, when drawing or painting (or moving or anything for that
matter), there would only be a small
20 matches
Mail list logo
