Hi,
Daniel Rogers wrote:
> >Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It
> >would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
>
> I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made
> any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projec
Hi,
"Jakub Friedl (listy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> so 2.2 will be gegl based?
That hasn't been decided yet. Perhaps we will start to use some GEGL
functionality in 2.2 already but don't expect any user-visible changes
due to this.
Sven
___
Gimp
six months after 2.0.0 hits the streets.
Sven
so 2.2 will be gegl based?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Hi,
Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp.
> > It would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
>
> I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has
> made any specific plans.
We did indeed make ver
Daniel Rogers wrote:
Hopefully it won't be that long to a next stable release of gimp. It
would be nice to see it in 2004 (albeit late 2004).
I have been asked to point out that is is my opinion and noone has made
any specific plans. (From talking with other open source projects, 9-12
month r
