Re: [Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-17 Thread gg
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:35:29 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 23:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the library refered to above? Can someone suggest something I can run through 'find' to locate whatever cruft is lying around on this system?

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-16 Thread gg
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:47:54 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because the version number is in the library. You also would want your plug-ins to use ~/.gimp-2.3 when you are running gimp-2.3. Even plug-ins that were compiled against an older version of the gimp libraries. Still

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 23:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the library refered to above? Can someone suggest something I can run through 'find' to locate whatever cruft is lying around on this system? There's 'ldd' to check what libs a binary is picking up. That should help

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-15 Thread gg
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:36:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I had gimp-cvs installed in /opt/gimp and wanted to use gimp-2.2 to print some photos. I was getting errors starting gimp-2.2 so I ran make install on gimp-cvs but 2.2. failed to start thowing up half a dozen errors. $

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-15 Thread Michael Schumacher
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do I need to clean out to be able to run gimp-2.2 ? You should start by confirming what exactly $ gimp is and what it does run. HTH, Michael -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN:

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 07:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had gimp-cvs installed in /opt/gimp and wanted to use gimp-2.2 to print some photos. I was getting errors starting gimp-2.2 so I ran make install on gimp-cvs but 2.2. failed to start thowing up half a dozen errors.