On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:36:51 -0300
From: Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:47 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Jakub Steiner wrote:
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:57:49 +0200
From: Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fennec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:13 -0400, Fennec wrote:
[EMAIL
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 21:41 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
Forgot to say this: not only had I complained, but I also offered to
fix the issues with the python scripts right away, and you just said
it was too late.
Me saying that it is late, even too late, doesn't mean that
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:13 -0400, Fennec wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all file formats
associated with it. It would be possible to have separate icons for every
format handled by the GIMP, but somebody would have to create them.
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fennec wrote:
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:13:47 -0400
From: Fennec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all file formats
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from different
plug-ins, I am just waiting for the time a user reports a bug in Whirl and
Pinch (for example) and doesn't realize which version they were using (as in
the
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:47 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from
different plug-ins, I am just waiting for the time a user reports
a bug in Whirl and Pinch (for example) and
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 09:36 pm, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:47 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from
different plug-ins, I am just waiting
Sven Neumann writes:
And so far I don't see anyone complaining about my proposal to not
install any Python scripts at all with GIMP 2.4.
Not installing scripts that are there strictly as example code
makes sense. Would they stay in CVS head, so it would be easy
for people learning gimp-python
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 21:36 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
It is allright for me if you do not install then- but I had
complained. - At least count that.
IIRC, there hasn't been a comment in the respective bug report, but I
might be wrong.
Actually we could think of then
On Tuesday, June 27, 2006, 6:43:59, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
But even win95 has different icons for different kinds of images. The
GIMP currently has just no clue.
Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all file formats
associated with it. It would be possible to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all file formats
associated with it. It would be possible to have separate icons for every
format handled by the GIMP, but somebody would have to create them.
I don't suppose the Tango project has anything we
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
Now I just stumbled into an 'interesting' bug arising from this
confusion:
Python-fu Whirl and Pinch had overwritten the menu entry for C Whirl
and Pinch (moreover Python whirl and pinch is currently crashing)
Now that GIMP handles registration of the same
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 01:43 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
I e mentioned once or two that when the script-fu and python-fu
scripts where brought togetehr to teh same menu space as the C
filters there would be confusion about which menu entry is associated
with a script in
14 matches
Mail list logo