Re: [Gimp-developer] plug-in distribution choices

2001-05-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Michael Spunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I always wondered why noone stands up and volunteers to take over the > > website maintainance. But it looks as if everyone gets bored doing web > > stuff really soon... > > The Gimp User Group (http://gug.sunsite.dk) contacted some Gimp > devel

Re: [Gimp-developer] plug-in distribution choices

2001-05-21 Thread Michael Spunt
Hello Sven! > I always wondered why noone stands up and volunteers to take over the > website maintainance. But it looks as if everyone gets bored doing web > stuff really soon... The Gimp User Group (http://gug.sunsite.dk) contacted some Gimp developers for several times about this but never re

web site (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] plug-in distribution choices)

2001-05-21 Thread Branko Collin
On 21 May 2001, at 14:58, Sven Neumann wrote: > "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Also, it seems to me that this whole things depends on finding > > enough maintainers. Judging by the state of the web site (parts of > > it have not been kept up-to-date for a while now) that is going

Re: [Gimp-developer] plug-in distribution choices

2001-05-21 Thread Branko Collin
On 20 May 2001, at 16:36, Sven Neumann wrote: > "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > My suggestion is that the following plug-ins belong to the core > > distribution: [4 rules of inclusion snipped] > > Can such a distinction be made? > > You are right that we need to make such a

Re: [Gimp-developer] plug-in distribution choices

2001-05-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am I to understand that there is no recorded instance of this > discussion? Well, let's start now, then, so that next time we can > point to the mailing list archives. The mailing list archive definitely has at least parts of this discussion.