Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:33 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote: File-new from an image window copies the characteristics of that window, too, so I now find myself creating grayscale images all the time. It would be nice if we could finally get to the overhaul of the Templates menu in

Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:33 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote: Not clear these are bugs, I'll gladly file bugs for them if it will help. (1) filters-recently used has a list of recnetly used fiters; these menu items bringup dialogue boxes, so they should have ... after the names, and

Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread peter sikking
Sven wrote: Liam wrote: (2) am I the ony person bothered by having two entries for New in the file menu? They should probably be combined. So far no one came up with a good proposal on how this could be solved. the structure is good: 'New...' _must_ remain a first level menu item,

Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:46 +0200, peter sikking wrote: the structure is good: 'New...' _must_ remain a first level menu item, the rest is OK to have in a sub-menu. My solution is to rename the 'New' sub-menu to 'Create' We have done that change in trunk. Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:46 +0200, peter sikking wrote: the structure is good: 'New...' _must_ remain a first level menu item, agreed with that part... the rest is OK to have in a sub-menu. and with this... My solution is to rename the 'New' sub-menu to 'Create' so I think this is a good

Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread SorinN
New Layer from Clipboard, New Layer from Screenshoot ( to be explicit and correct and to be online with the Usability rules ), anyway AS IS NOW is pretty OK. 2008/9/19 Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:46 +0200, peter sikking wrote: the structure is good: 'New...'