On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
Yeah, really, Little Scheme (http://www.crockford.com/javascript/scheme.html)
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 15:17, Markus Triska wrote:
2. Its main developer (Tom Lord) is desperately in need of cash, as he is
currently unemployed. (or at least was the last time I checked).
Visit http://gnuarch.org/ for more information. While he is de facto
unemployed, as you say, he
On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
Please ask Tom, not me, because he is doing it, or visit his
On Thursday 15 July 2004 21:52, Markus Triska wrote:
On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Markus Triska wrote:
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:52:36 +
From: Markus Triska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scheme [was Re: [Gimp-developer] OSCon attendance]
On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Each of the nominated projects
On Thursday 15 July 2004 07:12 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Anyone can go and write another
editor or bug tracker or window manager, if he'd like. That's one of the
rights that Liberalism gives you. But if someone wishes to embark on
something like that I'd advise him to contribute to an existing
