Re: Gimp to MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread egger
On 21 Jul, Michael Natterer wrote: I guess that Gtk+ and Gimp will run more or less automatically on MacOS X' BSD API once there is an X server, so there should be no need to "port" it. A X server for MacOS is due to be released by Apple, soon -- Servus, Daniel

Re: The Gimp is wasting a lot of memory

2000-07-23 Thread egger
On 20 Jul, somnorici wrote: I set the undo levels to zero and loaded an image. 9376 by 11488 pixels grayscale is 107,711,488 bytes. My display depth is 16 bits. It didn't take long to link this with the swap file, which after loading the image was 292,421,632 bytes, plus the 32 megs of tile

Re: The Gimp is wasting a lot of memory

2000-07-23 Thread kelly
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:45:05 -, "somnorici " [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I set the undo levels to zero and loaded an image. 9376 by 11488 pixels grayscale is 107,711,488 bytes. My display depth is 16 bits. It didn't take long to link this with the swap file, which after loading the image was

Re: Gimp to MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, Will it be free? Will it be a standard part of MacOS? (Or is it something Mac users will have to pay for?) See ya Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21 Jul, Michael Natterer wrote: I guess that Gtk+ and Gimp will run more or less automatically on MacOS

Re: Gimp to MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread egger
On 23 Jul, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: Will it be free? Will it be a standard part of MacOS? (Or is it something Mac users will have to pay for?) Sorry, I have got no details handy. Read about it on slashdot or somewhere. Have a look at the usual MAC places to get info about that... --

Re: Gimp on MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread kelly
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:09:31 -0400, "Jason T. Slack" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: A question: (An odd question) How did GIMP get permission to use the same Icons in the toolbox as Photoshop. Did they have to goto Adobe and get permission? They just look the same. Doctrine of merger would probably

Re: Gimp to MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 23 Jul, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: Will it be free? Will it be a standard part of MacOS? (Or is it something Mac users will have to pay for?) Sorry, I have got no details handy. Read about it on slashdot or somewhere. Have a look at the

Re: Gimp to MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread egger
On 23 Jul, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: OK, I'll do that (eventually). But my point is, if X Windows isn't available on every Mac system... or at least if they can't get it for free... then it is worth porting the GIMP (and GTK+, GDK, etc) to the native MacOS API. I'm not against a

Re: The Gimp is wasting a lot of memory

2000-07-23 Thread somnorici
That's the point: I need no alpha, layers or something. Just a rectangular selection for crop, flip and a simple striping plugin (which I wrote). And the swap file went to three times the size by just loading the image, not even moving or clicking the mouse, zero undo levels. 64 megs of ram is

Re: The Gimp is wasting a lot of memory

2000-07-23 Thread Tomas Ogren
On 23 July, 2000 - somnorici sent me these 2.8K bytes: Do you guys know of any open-source program for linux that does simple operations (rectangular select, crop, flip, and I'll write the striping thing) on huge images? That would save the reputation of Linux in front of those guys.

Re: The Gimp is wasting a lot of memory

2000-07-23 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 04:01:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure if the projection buffer is constructed conservatively or not. As I recall projection is done bottom-up instead of top-down, which makes conservative construction difficult. I planned a top-down No matter what,

Re: The Gimp is wasting a lot of memory

2000-07-23 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:16:30AM +0200, Tomas Ogren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: operations (rectangular select, crop, flip, and I'll write the striping thing) on huge images? That would save the reputation of Linux in front of those guys. ImageMagick? Available on just about every Unix,

Re: Gimp to MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread Jason T. Slack
on 7/23/00 3:30 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :-) This isn't my project. The port is being done by Jason T. Slack [EMAIL PROTECTED] . I've got enough work, working on matterial ( http://matterial.sourceforge.net/ ). Ok, I am cross posting this to both

Re: Gimp to MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, "Jason T. Slack" wrote: on 7/23/00 3:30 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :-) This isn't my project. The port is being done by Jason T. Slack [EMAIL PROTECTED] . I've got enough work, working on matterial ( http://matterial.sourceforge.net/ ). Ok,

Re: Gimp to MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread pixel fairy
impress is probably as good as weve got for a page layout app. so something like that would be a good development, especially with your experience. we do need good non linear animation, but i think the best way to do that would be to build it around the gimp, alot like GAP, but to support some

Re: Gimp to MacOS

2000-07-23 Thread Carl B. Constantine
On 7/23/2000 19:22, Jason T. Slack at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a nice Desk-top publishing app for Linux out? (Something Like Quark Xpress, PageMaker or Indesign?) there is a version of FrameMaker available for Linux as a beta. It's currently free, but once the beta is done, that may