Re: Layers, dialogs and other bits of love on Valentines Day

2001-02-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Emmanuel Mwangi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyways, all that is far off. I was wondering you could just have nested layers in this next version of Gimp. It doesn't even have to have all the strange but, cool stuff that tigert was talking about but, even just being able to organize your

testers needed for bugs #22567 and #50867

2001-02-16 Thread Raphael Quinet
It looks like some strange things are happening in the Gimp (any version since 1.1.x) if you create an image of size 1x63 or similar sizes. Some of these effects (related to the tile management, IIRC) had been discussed on this list in the past, but the strange thing is that some people (Seth,

RE: Layers, dialogs and other bits of love on Valentines Day

2001-02-16 Thread gimptek DESIGNS
Hi, Emmanuel Mwangi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyways, all that is far off. I was wondering you could just have nested layers in this next version of Gimp. It doesn't even have to have all the strange but, cool stuff that tigert was talking about but, even just being able to organize your

Re: Layers, dialogs and other bits of love on Valentines Day

2001-02-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "gimptek DESIGNS" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe I wasn't clear. I didn't mean layering should change in any way than it does now (except maybe adding Photoshop style color dodge ;) but, just the representation of it should. The way the layers stack isn't the change that I was

Re: RUN_WITH_LAST_VALUES

2001-02-16 Thread Miles O'Neal
Robert L Krawitz said... | |Under what circumstances is RUN_WITH_LAST_VALUES intended to be used? |Is it something I should be particularly concerned with in the print |plugin, or would dropping it be reasonable? It's for when you want to rerun a plugin withoout having to mess with the values.