Just a quick note since I don't have the email which
I accidentally sent to Nick but meant to send to the
list here with me at work...
Since the patch to generate multiple thumbnails
went in, the load-image-generate-thumbnail cycle
occurs twice when you ask for a single thumbnail.
Needless to
Thanks to those who've been working on the new menu
structure -- mitch and sven. The new layout is significantly
more intuitive and organised in both the user and developer
domains.
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.foxbox.org/
Not bad. Quite pertinent to GIMP.
http://sendmail.net/?feed=interviewkuniavsky
Not that I think GIMP's UI is bad (lately) or that
we have a particular reason to actively innovate as
opposed to more of less cribbing, ahem, someone's UI.
--Adam
a gdk_events_pending()
succeeds in a single-threaded app then it's not just GIMP that's
going to have a problem...
...unless this is documented cross-platform behaviour, of
course! Tell me if I missed something.
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.foxbox.org/
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Since I've touched app/xcf.[ch] too:
I hereby give my permission for anyone to use the portions of xcf.c
that I have written under the terms of the LGPL.
Oh yeah, same here.
--
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.foxbox.org
the 'something modified, really
quit?' dialog but the 'okay' button then makes the dialog
vanish but GIMP doesn't quit. The 'quit' menu entry gets
greyed-out and, well, you can't quit. Admittedly, no-one
should want to quit GIMP anyway.
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTED]http
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Jun, Adam D. Moss wrote:
Two immediately noticable ones are:
1) moving a layer with the move tool is broken, no longer
tracks pointer after first 'settle' of motion.
2) ctrl-q to quit brings up the 'something modified, really
quit?' dialog
I hadn't noticed that -- I'm changing it now. I'm changing the
former to 100ms since the latter only works with 100ms-
granularity. I may yet reconsider and default both to 200ms.
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.foxbox.org/
Hour by hour / Day by day / Love
if it quick'n'dirty fixes won't suffice then I think
that at this point IScissors would have to be ditched
completely until 1.3.x (I don't think it has to come to that
-- do you have any specific complaints with IScissors as they
stand?).
Thanks!
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTED
. The 1.1.x codebase has drifted from the
HOLLYWOOD GIMP to an unreconcilable degree -- 16-bit support
will be part of GIMP 2.0 (ETA summer 2009) or would have to be
reimplimented from scratch or otherwise hacked up for 1.3 (unlikely).
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTE
swapspace so GIMP leans on that to a much
greater degree -- I expect that performance would probably
be a bit worse in high-mem-usage conditions, but your
OS is also probably better at keeping memory defragmented
and reclaimed than GIMP's hand-rolled swapsystem is (cop out).
--
Adam D. Moss
d interchangeable then there's no
worries.
I believe they're interchangable (with minor semantic differences
from a core-developer point of view).
--
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.foxbox.org/
"Shut up, Donkey. Talking animals have no place in comic strips."
Austin Donnelly wrote
Previously, I was using cvs.labs.redhat.com (199.183.24.238) as my CVS
server. Now I've moved to cvs.gnome.org (209.116.70.81) and that one
works
Bah! I've been sitting here thinking that redhat
screwed the CVS server for weeks. (I suppose that's
not inaccurate, if
currently but the impetus to fix things has been faltering to
match. The tree is in reasonably good shape and a release would
hopefully revitalize the development team -- after the first year
or so the 1.1.x cycle started to feel more like purgatory than
software development!
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss
al, very minimal spare time so this
message is a (not terribly) compressed view of several months both
in the past and future. When I can begin to demonstrate a small
GIMP-like app built upon the pupus pipeline I will issue a
code-drop. If I can't do that then it's worthless and I give up!
For th
Michael wrote:
Theoretically this
would resemble the layer without mask
That's if you assume that the masking is additive -- actually
it's multiplicative.
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.foxbox.org/
16 matches
Mail list logo