>I was used to adjusting photoshop to prevent it swapping, and tried to do
>that with GIMP, the above figures were based on my idea that X wanted 30
>megs and gimp seemed to want about 10 or so, leaving about 20 left for the
>image. All wrong, terribly wrong. I set the cache to 30 megs last nigh
On 7 Jun, Sven Neumann wrote:
> As profiling the Gimp shows, there's the need and room for
> optimization. Marc and Daniel did work on this last weekend
> and hopefully we will soon see those changes in CVS.
I'd be very glad I you could apply this patches I'll send them to
you soon
-
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, pixel fairy wrote:
>> It was set to 8, or 10, or 15, I've tried them all,
>> 8 seemed to be faster
>> as that stopped Gimp having to swap to VM or push
>> other apps out to disc.
>
> 8,10,15? where do you get these numbers? your tile
> cache should be alot more than that.
I
Hi,
> at 4k x 3k for most things you do see the line comming
> down. its slow for hue/sat/lightness adjustments, and
> fastest for curves. i may try this on windows, but i
> think some of the others on this list have already
> beaten that horse enough.
Someone already mentioned it, but I want to
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, pixel fairy wrote:
>
> Hmm, you can adjust contrast, colour curves and
> levels in more or less
> realtime? Can you tell me what hardware you have?
celeron with ati rage fury (32MB), only for its
support of hardware gamma. my ancient PCI mell
Hyperborean wrote:
>
> Could it be that Photoshop does the previews only on the
> visible pixels?
I'm with George on this one! Pre-vue mode should be visible pixels
only.
--
Jon Winters http://www.obscurasite.com/jon/
"Everybody Loves The GIMP!"
http://www.gimp.org/
Andy Thomas wrote:
> What version of gimp are you using? The recent CVS versions had a real
> bug in the updating of previews when using the levels/curves stuff.
On the advice of Andy and others I disabled the layer pre-vue images and
things speeded up quite a bit. (they also mentioned this is
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Jon Winters's letter:
>
> I'm forwarding this from gimp-user for anyone who is not on that list.
> There was a question regarding performance and configuration but I can't
> seem to get Gimp to outperform Photoshop.
>
> TIA for any configuration tweeks that m
IL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Performance of Gimp vs. photoshop for large images
Hello all,
Yesturday I requested that our friend send me a copy of his image so that
I could try the test on my computer at work. (PIII 400 128MB, Matrox G400,
WinNT)
I chose to test with levels because I ad
