Re: the .po filename domain

2000-02-21 Thread Nick Lamb
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 01:37:39PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? [Sleepy misunderstanding deleted] Just in case anyone else is as tired as Marc was when he wrote that, we're using the same convention as everyone else in gettext-land,

Re: the .po filename domain

2000-02-21 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 21 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? In the current gimp, we have a en_GB translation, however, GB is not a toplevel domain, but the iso-3166 code for the UK. On the other hand, we also have uk (which is a toplevel domain, but not for

Re: the .po filename domain

2000-02-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? In the current gimp, we have a en_GB translation, however, GB is not a toplevel domain, but the iso-3166 code for the UK. On the other hand, we also have uk (which is a toplevel domain, but not for ukraine), however, the

Re: the .po filename domain

2000-02-21 Thread Manish Singh
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 01:37:39PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? In the current gimp, we have a en_GB translation, however, GB is not a toplevel domain, but the iso-3166 code for the UK. On the other hand, we also have uk (which is a