Re: a little optimization flip instead of rotate 180

2000-04-29 Thread pixel fairy


can you add this as a tip of the day then?

--- Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the rotate90 routines could need a little
> optimization, but to do so, we'd 
> have to move them into the core (they are performed
> in a plug-in now). This 
> will probably happen in the next development cycle,
> but not before 1.2.
> 
> 
> Salut, Sven
> 
> 
> 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/



Re: a little optimization flip instead of rotate 180

2000-04-29 Thread Sven Neumann

Hi,

the rotate90 routines could need a little optimization, but to do so, we'd 
have to move them into the core (they are performed in a plug-in now). This 
will probably happen in the next development cycle, but not before 1.2.


Salut, Sven





Re: a little optimization flip instead of rotate 180

2000-04-28 Thread pixel fairy

ok, one flip horizontal and one vertical.

--- Jon Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, pixel fairy wrote:
> 
> > for rotate->180, why not just flip vertical? its
> much 
> > faster
> 
> They are two completely different things.  Try each
> operation on some
> text.
> 
> --
> Jon Winters http://www.obscurasite.com/
> 
>"Everybody loves the GIMP!" 
>   http://www.gimp.org/
> 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/



Re: a little optimization flip instead of rotate 180

2000-04-28 Thread Jon Winters

On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, pixel fairy wrote:

> for rotate->180, why not just flip vertical? its much 
> faster

They are two completely different things.  Try each operation on some
text.

--
Jon Winters http://www.obscurasite.com/

   "Everybody loves the GIMP!" 
  http://www.gimp.org/




Re: a little optimization flip instead of rotate 180

2000-04-28 Thread Ian McKellar

On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 05:35:28AM -0700, pixel fairy wrote:
> for rotate->180, why not just flip vertical? its much 
> faster

1) Its not nececarilly faster
2) they're not the same

original:

###
#  #
###
#
#

flip vertical:

#
#
###
#  #
###

rotate 180:

   #
   #
 ###
#  #
 ###

Ian

-- 
Ian  McKellar | Email: yakk(a)yakk.net | Web: http://www.yakk.net/
Fax: +61 (8) 9265 0821 / +0 (775) 205 0307 | Home: +61 (8) 9389 9152
If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat.



a little optimization flip instead of rotate 180

2000-04-28 Thread pixel fairy

for rotate->180, why not just flip vertical? its much 
faster



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/