Re: high dynamic range images

1999-10-26 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen

On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
>  >On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 15:15:37 -0500, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
> 
> > It's alive and well, but rather seriously divergent from the head
> > branch.  Merging the two would be a substantial effort.
> 
> Where might one learn more about its progress?  The web pages that
> link from the Gimp site seem pretty stale.  Or at least old enough to
> make one wonder if the effort is still ongoing.  Is there a working
> release?

Would it be worth it to merge them though? I mean the current CVS gimp has
so much nice stuff for graphics tablets and such, that it'd suck to leave
the Hollywood branch without them?

Tuomas

.---( t i g e r t @ g i m p . o r g )---.
| some stuff at http://tigert.gimp.org/ |
`---'



Re: high dynamic range images

1999-10-25 Thread tomfool


 >On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 15:15:37 -0500, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:

> It's alive and well, but rather seriously divergent from the head
> branch.  Merging the two would be a substantial effort.

Where might one learn more about its progress?  The web pages that
link from the Gimp site seem pretty stale.  Or at least old enough to
make one wonder if the effort is still ongoing.  Is there a working
release?

-Tom Sgouros

---
tomss at ids.net - 401-861-2831



Re: high dynamic range images

1999-10-25 Thread Kelly Lynn Martin

On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 15:15:48 -0400, Gregory McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

-> This would require substantial changes to the GIMP core to support.

>Wasn't this something the 'HOLLYWOOD' branch in cvs was fiddling
>with? Or did that branch wither and die?

It's alive and well, but rather seriously divergent from the head
branch.  Merging the two would be a substantial effort.

Kelly



Re: high dynamic range images

1999-10-25 Thread Gregory McLean

-> On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 17:04:52 -0400, "Byong Mok Oh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
-> 
-> >Sorry about that.  High dynamic range image can be thought of as
-> >having 3 floating point values for RGB instead of 8 or 16 bits per
[snip]
-> 
-> This would require substantial changes to the GIMP core to support.


Wasn't this something the 'HOLLYWOOD' branch in cvs was fiddling with? Or 
did that branch wither and die?


Gregory McLean  | On two occasions I have been asked by members of 
comstar.net inc.|Parliament, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the 
programmer/analyst  |machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' 
770 485-6016|I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion
|of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Babbage
This is my opinion, All MINE! I tell you--




Re: high dynamic range images

1999-10-21 Thread Kelly Lynn Martin

On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 17:04:52 -0400, "Byong Mok Oh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>Sorry about that.  High dynamic range image can be thought of as
>having 3 floating point values for RGB instead of 8 or 16 bits per
>channel (usually expressed in 4 unsigned chars as RGB and an
>exponent).  It is pretty hot in computer graphics since raytracing
>algorithms can output not just color but actual "brightness" values
>of the scene.

This would require substantial changes to the GIMP core to support.
It might be possible to load such an image, but it would have to be
converted to standard 8-bit RGB (with concomitant information loss) to 
be manipulated.

Kelly



RE: high dynamic range images

1999-10-21 Thread Byong Mok Oh

Sorry about that.

High dynamic range image can be thought of as having 3 floating point values
for RGB instead of 8 or 16 bits per channel (usually expressed in 4 unsigned
chars as RGB and an exponent).  It is pretty hot in computer graphics since
raytracing algorithms can output not just color but actual "brightness"
values of the scene.

-Mok

> -Original Message-
> From: Kelly Lynn Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 5:04 PM
> To: Byong Mok Oh
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: high dynamic range images
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 15:28:48 -0400, "Byong Mok Oh"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >Hi, Has anyone written a plug-in that reads in a high dynamic range
> >images?
>
> You'll have to define what you mean by "high dynamic range image".
>
> Kelly
>



Re: high dynamic range images

1999-10-21 Thread Kelly Lynn Martin

On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 15:28:48 -0400, "Byong Mok Oh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>Hi, Has anyone written a plug-in that reads in a high dynamic range
>images?

You'll have to define what you mean by "high dynamic range image".

Kelly



high dynamic range images

1999-10-21 Thread Byong Mok Oh

Hi,

Has anyone written a plug-in that reads in a high dynamic range images?

thanks,
Mok

---
b y O n g   m O k   O h
MIT Computer Graphics Group
http://graphics.lcs.mit.edu/~boh/
http://www.bam.com/send.htm  &  (617) 872-6684