Re: some tiff image kills the tiff plug-in

2000-01-23 Thread Marc Lehmann

On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 04:33:02AM +, Nick Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This (the segfault) is now fixed in CVS. Stupid one line thinko.

Great!

 I can't figure out a nice way to avoid "image might be inverted", but it
 only happens for images we don't really understand (Marc's was a CMYK
 separation as far as I can tell) and for those we ask libtiff to do all
 the heavy lifting. If anyone REALLY cares about this they can send me
 a nice fat cheque and I'll write a few 000 lines more code :)

I also believe that this case is far less important than fixing the crash
;- I wouldn't even mind gimp refusing to load the file, on the grounds
that it does not support the colour model.

-- 
  -==- |
  ==-- _   |
  ---==---(_)__  __   __   Marc Lehmann  +--
  --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
  -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\   XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation   |
 |



Re: some tiff image kills the tiff plug-in

2000-01-22 Thread Nick Lamb

On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 11:56:31PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
 I've got an 34k tiff file that xv cannot load (many errors), and gimp
 gives an error message "Falling back to RGBA, image might be inverted" (two
 times) and then the tiff-plug-in segfaults ...

This (the segfault) is now fixed in CVS. Stupid one line thinko.

I can't figure out a nice way to avoid "image might be inverted", but it
only happens for images we don't really understand (Marc's was a CMYK
separation as far as I can tell) and for those we ask libtiff to do all
the heavy lifting. If anyone REALLY cares about this they can send me
a nice fat cheque and I'll write a few 000 lines more code :)

Nick.



some tiff image kills the tiff plug-in

2000-01-17 Thread Marc Lehmann

I've got an 34k tiff file that xv cannot load (many errors), and gimp
gives an error message "Falling back to RGBA, image might be inverted" (two
times) and then the tiff-plug-in segfaults (no usable stacktrace, due to that