[Gimp-docs] more changes to help

2011-04-02 Thread Michael Grosberg
I have an idea for the Fire up the GIMP section; please tell me if you
agree wihtthis and I'll implement it.

First, the section title: I tried to rephrase the title since fire up the
GIMP is an awful one that doesn't belong in a help file, but it just means
running GIMP which is already the name of the first sub-section. So I
intend to combine both sections into one (the second one is very small
anyway), and furthermore I'd like to add a small section explaining how to
change the menurc file to the one that comes with GIMP (and is located in
the easy to find etc/gimp/2.0) and  has Photoshop keyboard shortcuts. The
result should change the section from this:

 2. Fire up the GIMP   1. Running GIMP   1.1. Known Platforms  1.2. Language
 1.3. Command Line Arguments   2. Starting GIMP the first time   2.1.
Finally . . . to this:
 2. Running GIMP   1. Running GIMP   1.1. Known Platforms  1.2. Language  1.3.
Command Line Arguments
1.4. For Photoshop Users

 1.5. Starting GIMP for the first time1.6. Before you proceed It looks weird
that there's a single running GIMP section inside another running GIMP
section; but it's already the case with Getting Unstuck. If there is a way
to get around it I'd like to hear about it.

If there is no objection I will implement these changes.

P.S. Why is the straight lines tutorial placed separately from all the
other quick tutorials?
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


Re: [Gimp-docs] Starting help for gimp-2.8

2011-03-29 Thread Michael Grosberg
I can rewrite that section for 2.6 - it's not much of a change - and keep
this version for when, gnu willing, the new version comes out.

2011/3/29 Julien Hardelin jm.h...@wanadoo.fr

 Hi Roman,

  On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 07:07:00AM +0100, Julien Hardelin wrote:
  For that, we need:
  - a separated git module for gimp-help-2.8, containing a copy of the
  present gimp-help-2 at first.
  - a gimp-doc-wiki(like the old we had) with the list of features that
  must be updated, and the possibility of knowing who works on what.
  Perhaps for this, the developers wouldn't mind if the documentation team
  could use the wiki as well?
 
  I could perhaps ask on the developer mailing list for this
  opportunity...
 

 The wiki is not the most important as long as contributors are few.
 But what about a separated module for gimp-help-pre-2.8?

 Michael sent a re-written quickie.xml file. This tutorial is much better
 than the present one, but it refers to the Export command, which is a
 gimp-2.7 feature.
 I can't push it to the gimp-help-2 repository.
 Michael is a valuable recruit for gimp-help. I'm afraid he will turn
 discouraged if its work is not validated.

 Cheers,

 Julien
 ___
 Gimp-docs mailing list
 Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
 https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs

___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


Re: [Gimp-docs] building documentation?

2011-03-27 Thread Michael Grosberg
2011/3/26 Ulf-D. Ehlert ud...@web.de


 I wonder if we won't get a copyright problem if the images are
 replaced... And even if not, shouldn't we show respect for the
 original author?


Obviously not - the entire thing is under the GNU Free documentation
License. The original images were taken from Astronomy picture of the Day,
and checking the About page, I see they were not released under any kind
of free license; some of them may be copyrighted. If anything, replacing the
images will make the doc more free. As for my own pictures, I figure if I
add them to the documentation they fall under the GNU FDL.
Anther reason for taking the time to replace all of them was that I wanted
all the screenshots to have a similar theme (clearlooks, which I believe is
the Gnome 2.x default) and I had to replace at least some because the
interface has changed.

As for respect, I have all respect to Carol Spears who invested her time and
effort to write the original tutorials, and I kept the credit in the
introduction. But while it is natural for tutorials on personal website to
maintain a casual tone and have tangential interests such as astronomy
feature in the tutorials, I believe official documentation should be more
professional. These are, after all, quick tutorials for those who don't want
to read the entire manual to get some small task done; I tried to make it as
short and to the point as possible.
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


Re: [Gimp-docs] building documentation?

2011-03-24 Thread Michael Grosberg
2011/3/24 Owen rc...@pcug.org.au


 Could I suggest that you run autogen.sh again, and read the last 20 or
 so lines.

 Just see what programs weren't found and install them.

 Now if you have the style sheets on your computer, it shouldn't have
 to go to the net to get them. Install all the stylesheets you can find
 (I think you were using Ubuntu so just search synaptic for stylesheets
 )

 Owen


Thanks! It's working now. And with a launcher to a small script that
generates a draft of a single file, I can preview with the click of a
button, like God intended :)

I see you've already changed the wiki, so add the following:
docbook-xsl (this is the one with the stylesheets)
docbook-utils (solved a number of dependencies)

There might be more packages necessary; I added a bunch of other packages,
don't remember which, I just ticked anything that seemed like it was related
to docbook.
Also, I still get one line of missing dependencies:
  checking for dot... no
I couldn't find something called dot in synaptic and it seems to be
working without it anyway.

Now, some more questions:
1. There are two folders, both with XML files: XML and SRC. I understand XML
is the one files are built from, and SRC is the one GIT uses to fetch files.
But how do the two interact? do I copy files manually or is there some tool
or script to update one or the other? In other words what is the work
process here?

2. UI screenshots: Do you have a preference for the theme used in the
screenshots? The wiki says screenshots should use the default theme but is
it the Gnome's or Ubuntu's default theme I should be using? Gnome's default
is Clearlooks, right?

3. I intend to replace the astronomy images used in the quickies with images
more representative of something a normal user would use, everyday objects
such as cars, animals, plants, tourist attractions and if I find the right
subjects, people. These are good looking images I took myself, but I want to
know if I need to do anything rights-wise, you know, do I need to explicitly
release them under the GPL or CC or what have you, and if I do, how do I do
it.

4. it's a long shot, but does anyone here use Notepad++ and has the correct
HTMLtidy settings file to correctly reflow and indent docbook XML?
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


[Gimp-docs] building documentation?

2011-03-23 Thread Michael Grosberg
IT's taken some time (I had a rather optimistic estimate of tmy free time)
but I'm finally making some headway with rewriting parts of the
documentation. My current aim is to rewrite Gimplite Quickies. Problem is, I
still don't know how to build the html. I was told here on the mailing list
that Ubuntu has all the needed tools but I wasn't told what they are...
Validating is not a problem, I have XML validation tools, but editing XML
blindly can only go so far: I really need to see what I'm doing.

Can anyone help me with this?

BTW, I'm targeting 2.8, i.e., changing references from save as to
Export, etc.
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


Re: [Gimp-docs] concepts

2011-02-25 Thread Michael Grosberg
2011/2/23 Julien Hardelin jm.h...@wanadoo.fr

 Hi Michael,

 OK for substance.

 Some remarks about form:

 - TAB are set to 2 spaces.

 - Lines are less than 80 characters and spaces.


OK, figured out how to do those with Notepad++.



 - When explaining a term, please add an indexterm
indexterm
  primaryResolution/primary
/indexterm
   This will automatcally appear in the index chapter: last line in
 the html summary.


I've been meaning to ask about this: There were 7 terms in concepts.xml but
only one of them, channels, had an indexterm. So if I understand correctly,
the reason is that those other terms are explained at length elsewhere, and
THOSE places are linked to in the index, while there is no other reference
to resolution in the help?


 - I noticed 2 typos: reslution and noticable. You probably have a
 spelling command in your editor.


Yup. I guess I'm so used to check-as-you-type spellcheckers I haven't
thought of runing a spell check.


  what
  is the significance of adding acronym and quote tags? what are they
  for? they seem to have no influence on the final output.
 

 For acronym, I don't know. But quote is important for
 internationalization. With quoteHello/quote, I automatically get the
 French quotes in French html (« Hello ») with indivisible spaces!

 I made these changes in your xml file. Do you want I push your changes?


Sure.
___
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


[Gimp-docs] concepts

2011-02-22 Thread Michael Grosberg
So, in the last couple of weeks I tried to look up material about Docbook.
I'm still not sure about how you people edit the help files, and I'd
obviously prefer a more wysiwg way of doing things, but for now I'll settle
for XML-aware editors. I downloaded the repository to my Linux volume but
I'm more comfortable working on Windows so I'm using Notepad++ for editing
and XMLnotepad to validate the XML.
Docbook seems straightforward enough but I do have some questions: what is
the significance of adding acronym and quote tags? what are they for?
they seem to have no influence on the final output.

Anyway here is my first change: I took the concepts page and added a
much-needed Resolution section. I know from experience this is a term that
many beginners find difficult to understand, especially when it comes to
understanding the resolution property of files coming from digital cameras.
I also removed the comparison of a multi-layer image to a book: it is a
confusing metaphor as it is nothing like a book in reality, so I changed it
to a stack of transparent sheets of paper.

Lastly, how important is the way these files are indented? I always use
tabs, and any editor I'm familiar with uses tabs to indent lines, while
these files seem to use spaces. Is is important to indent the XML in this
way?

regards
Michael
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.3//EN
   http://www.docbook.org/xml/4.3/docbookx.dtd;
!-- section history:
  2009-03-20 j.h: fixed bug #557343
  2008-06-03 prokoudine: yet another shot at Russian content
  2007-02-27 prokoudine: fixes to Russian translation
  2007-02-27 lexa: reorganized concepts
  2006-05-02 Dust: added Korean translation
  2006-02-27 kolbjørn: added norwegian
  2006-01-07 HdJ: Added quote and acronym tags, added english and dutch
 version of layers explanation
  2005-12-18 Lexa: reviewed and added de translation
--
sect1 xmlns:xi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude; id=gimp-concepts-basic
  titleBasic Concepts/title

  indexterm
primaryConcepts/primary
  /indexterm

  figure
titleWilber, the GIMP mascot/title
mediaobject
  imageobject
imagedata format=PNG fileref=images/using/wilber.png /
  /imageobject
  caption
para
  The Wilber_Construction_Kit (in src/images/) allows you to give the
  mascot a different appearance. It is the work of Tuomas Kuosmanen
  (tigertATgimp.org).
/para
  /caption
/mediaobject
  /figure
  para
This section provides a brief introduction to the basic concepts and
terminology used in acronymGIMP/acronym. The concepts presented here
are explained in
much greater depth elsewhere. With a few exceptions, we have avoided
cluttering this section with a lot of links and cross-references:
everything mentioned here is so high-level that you can easily
locate it in the index.
  /para
  variablelist
varlistentry
  termImages/term
  listitem
para
			 Images are the basic entities used by acronymGIMP/acronym. 
			Roughly speaking, an quoteimage/quote corresponds to a single file, 
			such as a TIFF or JPEG file. You can also think of an image as 
			corresponding to a single display window (although in truth it is 
			possible to have multiple windows all displaying the same image). It is 
			not possible to have a single window display more than one image, 
			though, or for an image to have no window displaying it. 
/para
para
			A acronymGIMP/acronym image may be quite a complicated thing. 
			Instead of thinking of it as a sheet of paper with a 
			picture on it, think of it as more like a stack of sheets, called 
			quotelayers/quote. In addition to a stack of layers, a 
			acronymGIMP/acronym image may contain a selection mask, a set of 
			channels, and a set of paths. In fact, acronymGIMP/acronym provides 
			a mechanism for attaching arbitrary pieces of data, called 
			quoteparasites/quote, to an image. 
/para
para
  In acronymGIMP/acronym, it is possible to have many images open
  at the same time. Although large images may use many megabytes of
  memory, acronymGIMP/acronym uses a sophisticated
  tile-based memory management system that allows
  acronymGIMP/acronym to handle very large images gracefully.
  There are limits, however, and having more memory available
  may improve system performance.
/para
  /listitem
/varlistentry
varlistentry
  termLayers/term
  listitem
para
		 If a simple image can be compared to a single sheet of paper, an image 
		with layers is likened to a sheaf of transparent papers stacked one on 
		top of the other. You can draw on each paper, but still see the contant 
		of the other sheets through the transparent areas. You can also move one 
		sheet in relation to the others. 
		Sophisticated