Re: [Gimp-docs] Colors/Desaturate/Desaturate documentation
On 03/27/2017 08:56 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > The resulting html page (shown here: > http://ninedegreesbelow.com/files/desaturate/8-18-desaturate.html) looks > good. > > Is there any reason why I shouldn't (try to) push this patch? > > I've been working on this patch for four days now and I'd like to finish > the project. No objections here - but I do not want to ursurp any process the documentation team may follow. -- Regards, Michael GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] Colors/Desaturate/Desaturate documentation
On 03/27/2017 11:28 AM, Elle Stone wrote: I will send you the "git status" terminal output and the xml file in a private email. Hi Julien, I did send you an email with the git status terminal output and the xml file. But there is a good chance you'll never get the email (there are problems with my email server). So I also uploaded a patch to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767763. I can upload desaturate.xml if you like. The "git status" terminal output can be downloaded from here: http://ninedegreesbelow.com/files/desaturate/git-status.txt Best, Elle ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] Colors/Desaturate/Desaturate documentation
On 03/27/2017 12:16 PM, Elle Stone wrote: The "git status" terminal output can be downloaded from here: http://ninedegreesbelow.com/files/desaturate/git-status.txt Never mind the git-status.txt. Starting with a fresh clone, the problem with the po files doesn't happen. Elle ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] Colors/Desaturate/Desaturate documentation
On March 27, 2017 4:29:11 PM GMT+02:00, Julien Hardelinwrote: >If you send your patches to bugzilla, the only who will resolve them, is me. Um... or anyone else with commit access? You don't have to do this all on your own, there is a number of people who can and do build the docs, and there is also the automated builds on docs.gimp.org. I found setting up a build environment on both Debian and RHEL (that's what docs.gimp.org uses) quite straight-forward, and expect this to be similar on other distros - i. e. try to build, see what's missing, install packages, repeat. -- Regards, Michael GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] Colors/Desaturate/Desaturate documentation
Hi Elle, Sorry if I hurt you. It was not my aim. Only searching a way to resolve this endless discussion. English is not my native language and my text does not allways transmit my mind. I repeat: your participation is a luck for gimp help. Time grasping is normal for a first contribution. If you send your patches to bugzilla, the only who will resolve them, is me. So the simplest way for you is to send me your xml files and I will push them. "push" is the consecrated term in git to send files to the git repository. it seems that some mails don't arrive. For instance, I sent you a command to validate a particular xml file (xmllint file.xml). It seems that you did not receive it. Git is a complex tool. Can you send your git status. I will see how to resolve your problem with po files. Best, Julien ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] Colors/Desaturate/Desaturate documentation
On 03/27/2017 01:58 AM, Julien Hardelin wrote: The Advanced options, along with Split View, Presets, and Preview, are common to *all* Color and Filter operations. I don't think it's appropriate to add an explanation about the Advanced options to each and every Color and Filter page in gimp help. To speak as plainly and clearly as possible, I will not add documentation regarding the Advanced options to the patch I'm working on for the desaturate menu. You don't need to write information here: only a link: Advanced options: Please see ..(link to a common-color-features.xml file to be created). There are not, as far as I can tell, such links in the current documentation to features that are in common to all the dialogs. I've been using the current documentation as a model. IMHO, there is no point in putting in a link to a file (help on Advanced options) that doesn't yet exist. There is no point in writing documentation for the Advanced options because this code is still in a state of flux. It's not even clear if this dialog will remain in the individual dialogs without specific user choice made in Preferences: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779620#c1 If someone else wants to write documentation for the Advanced options, of course I can't stop them. But I will not write documentation for the Advanced options, at least not until the code settles, and maybe not even then. In your file, we don't see that Luminance, Luma... belong to Mode. I don't understand what you mean. Do you want a screenshot of the expanded desaturate drop down menu? Will this suffice to show that "Luminance, Luma . . . belong to Mode"? Or do you mean something else altogether? Mode: Five options are available: OK, thanks! I don't think the original code (which I used as a pattern to follow) used , but if I overlooked this, my apologies. So you want me to change this: Five options are available: to this Mode: Five options are available I don't understand what you mean. Do you want me to remove something that appears in the following file, and perhaps move it to a tutorial? http://ninedegreesbelow.com/files/desaturate/8-18-desaturate.html If you do want me to remove something from what appears in the above link, please be very, very specific, as I'm having a difficult time grasping what you are trying to say. My apologies, my communications skills seem to be at an all-time low. I told you that, IMHO, your text can be accepted as it is. I am discussing about formatting the text. Time grasping is he same for me with all this discussion. If you don't understand again, please send me your xml file: I will return it with my propositions on formatting. If my text can be accepted as it is, then I don't know what your feedback about "tutorials" vs "documentation" was about. So my apologies. I think I'll just make a commit and deal with any remaining issues later. Best, Elle ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list