[Gimp-docs] section history

2010-06-02 Thread Ulf-D. Ehlert
Hi, our XML files still contain section history comments like IMO these comments are obsolete and useless, and we could remove them (whenever we edit XML files). What do you think? Ulf signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. _

Re: [Gimp-docs] where are the pdf snapshots?

2010-06-02 Thread Marco Ciampa
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:55:03AM +1000, Roman Joost wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 12:38:57AM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > The page: > > > > http://docs.gimp.org/index.html > > > > states: "Please visit our Downloads page for stable releases and PDF > > snapshots." > > > > but it seems

Re: [Gimp-docs] section history

2010-06-02 Thread Marco Ciampa
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:23:03PM +0200, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote: > Hi, > > our XML files still contain section history comments like > > > > IMO these comments are obsolete and useless, and we could remove them > (whenever we edit XML files). > > What do you think? > > Ulf Please do! M

Re: [Gimp-docs] where are the pdf snapshots?

2010-06-02 Thread Ulf-D. Ehlert
Roman Joost (Wednesday, 02. June 2010) > As far as I know, the PDF creation is b0rked after we moved to > gettext support. We have to fix that first in order to create PDFs > again. But I could be possibly wrong and Ulf knows more about this > issue. It seems that building a Russian PDF is broken

Re: [Gimp-docs] section history

2010-06-02 Thread Kolbjørn Stuestøl
Marco Ciampa skreiv: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:23:03PM +0200, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> our XML files still contain section history comments like >> >> >> >> IMO these comments are obsolete and useless, and we could remove them >> (whenever we edit XML files). >> >> What do y

Re: [Gimp-docs] section history

2010-06-02 Thread jhardlin
> our XML files still contain section history comments like > > > > IMO these comments are obsolete and useless, and we could remove them > (whenever we edit XML files). Anonymous xml files is not a good idea I think the history must be reserved for creation and adding new features. So

Re: [Gimp-docs] section history

2010-06-02 Thread Marco Ciampa
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 09:03:32PM +0200, jhardlin wrote: > > > our XML files still contain section history comments like > > > > > > > > IMO these comments are obsolete and useless, and we could remove them > > (whenever we edit XML files). > > Anonymous xml files is not a good idea > >

Re: [Gimp-docs] Spanish translation.

2010-06-02 Thread Juan Manuel Martínez
So far, Luis Diego didn't show up. How should we go on? Best Regards. 2010/5/12, Juan Manuel Martínez : > Hi there, > > I just want to contact the people working on spanish translation. > Best regards. > > Juan Manuel. > -- Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil _

Re: [Gimp-docs] section history

2010-06-02 Thread jhardlin
>> I think the history must be reserved for creation and adding new features. >> So, we can delete all what is about translation or fixing typos. >> > So git log are for what? Please avoid redundant data. > Rather complicated. When working on xml files, better to have this information at once.

Re: [Gimp-docs] Spanish translation.

2010-06-02 Thread jhardlin
Did you see http://l10n.gnome.org/teams/ ? > > So far, Luis Diego didn't show up. How should we go on? Best Regards. > > 2010/5/12, Juan Manuel Martínez : >> Hi there, >> >> I just want to contact the people working on spanish translation. >> Best regards. >> >> Juan Manuel. >> > ___