[Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-04 Thread Olivier Ripoll
Alan Horkan wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Pierre-Alexis wrote: Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:28:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Pierre-Alexis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GimpShop Maybe GimpShop should become an option in the

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That is a whole lot of maintainance work, way more than you might think. I would hope optimistically that things could be adjusted to work well for all kinds of users and I think it would be better to make efforts to improve the defaults first (but

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-04 Thread Manish Singh
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:08:03AM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:46:47 -0500 (EST) From: Jonathan D Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop Now, what I think would be really wonderful along these lines

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-04 Thread Michael Schumacher
Given that all the string changes in GimpShop occured in translatable strings, one wonders why patching the source was needed at all. The only other changes were to the menu files, which have been external since the change to GtkUIManager. Maybe for the script-fus... In fact, with a

[Gimp-user] Lossless JPEG Crop

2005-04-04 Thread Krishnan B
Is it possible in Gimp to crop a part of a JPEG image and save it as another JPG without loosing on quality ? If I use a quality factor of 100% ( Excellent quality), the cropped image has a bigger filesize than the original image !! Krishnan __

Re: [Gimp-user] Lossless JPEG Crop

2005-04-04 Thread Jeffrey Brent McBeth
Your best bet for a lossless JPEG crop is to use ImageMagick or the JPEG utils rather than GIMP. IIRC, there has been talk about allowing GIMP to do the few lossless JPEG transforms that are possible, but I haven't seen patches or release notes to the effect. something like jpegtran -perfect

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-04 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Sven Neumann wrote: Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:27:38 +0200 From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jonathan D Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED], gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop Hi, Alan Horkan [EMAIL

[Gimp-user] GIMP 2.2.0, 2.2.4 and gimp-print 5.0.0-beta2

2005-04-04 Thread Robin Pfeifer
Hello, I recently upgraded to GIMP 2.2 from 2.0, and I have found that I couldn't print anything anymore. The printing process would start (the calculation bar under the image running to 100%), but then nothing would be sent to the printer (I left it on for hours, but nothing happened). The

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-04 Thread Manish Singh
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote: Given that all the string changes in GimpShop occured in translatable strings, one wonders why patching the source was needed at all. The only other changes were to the menu files, which have been external since the

Re: [Gimp-user] Install

2005-04-04 Thread wayne
On Sunday 03 April 2005 08:54 am, GR Kumaran wrote: Hello, Can anyone give me the address or steps on how to install Gimp in MandrakeLinux? I had downloaded the RPM from Fedora, but I could not install it, when I do 'rpm -i ..'.Here the questions is, actually I am very new to

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You probably know the GNU Image manipulation program like the back of your hand but I think using the Procedure Browser/Plugin Database it to search for things is a massively useful and underrated feature. It encourages users to more easily find

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Huh? Something gives me the impression that the GimpShop author hould have spent more time in #gimp... He didn't care to ask any of the developers before starting this. All he did was asking a question in a GIMP forum that deals with resources

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.2.0, 2.2.4 and gimp-print 5.0.0-beta2

2005-04-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Robin Pfeifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So I decided to try the version 2.2.4. This wil not compile; configure stopped the first time saying that gimpprint-config was 4.2.6 while gimp-print 5.0 was found, and I should remove the old version. You misread what configure told you. It told

Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.2.0, 2.2.4 and gimp-print 5.0.0-beta2

2005-04-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Mogens Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Then you can install = compile the gimp-print - now Gutenprint - afterwards, just remember the option --with-gimp2 If you want to use the plug-in that comes with gimp-print 5, then you will want to compile GIMP with the --disable-print configure

[Gimp-user] Equivalent GIMP procedure compareed to Photoshop

2005-04-04 Thread Rikard Johnels
Hell list! I am new here, so please point me in the right direction if this has been up before... What would be the way to do something like this: http://www.photozone.de/7Digital/highpass.htm I am running Gimp 2.0.6 -- /Rikard Sharing knowledge is the most fundamental act of

[Gimp-user] Re: Equivalent GIMP procedure compareed to Photoshop

2005-04-04 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2005-04-05 at 0101.06 +0200): What would be the way to do something like this: http://www.photozone.de/7Digital/highpass.htm Follow http://www.3dgate.com/techniques/2001/010625/0625hajba.html for highpass part, the rest should not be different. GSR

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Equivalent GIMP procedure compareed to Photoshop

2005-04-04 Thread Kevin Coyner
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:23:10AM +0200, GSR - FR wrote.. Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2005-04-05 at 0101.06 +0200): What would be the way to do something like this: http://www.photozone.de/7Digital/highpass.htm Follow http://www.3dgate.com/techniques/2001/010625/0625hajba.html for

[Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-04 Thread Jonathan D Gibbons
Personally, I'd prefer that the developers work on enhancing the tool rather than making the tool look pretty (ier). I'd suggest that if someone likes the idea of skins, they take up that project and do it. Then get it into the code. I was actally not suggesting that the primary developers