[Gimp-user] Gimp-2.3.3 compile problem
Hi all, When trying to build gimp-2.3.3 - I just want to try the new SIOX based selection tool - I met the following compile problem: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o .libs/faxg3 faxg3.o g3.o run_tbl.o ../../libgimp/.libs/libgimp-2.0.so ../../libgimpcolor/.libs/libgimpcolor-2.0.so ../../libgimpbase/.libs/libgimpbase-2.0.so -L/usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so /home/steve/src/gimp-2.3.3/libgimpconfig/.libs/libgimpconfig-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to `gimp_matrix2_get_type' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Looks like that the dependency to libgimpmath is missing for several plugins. Have I missed something ? Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] tutorial/screenshots
Hi all, For those of you who have installed the imagemagick package, try: import -window root root.`date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S`.png for the whole screen. Bind it to a key with your favourite window manager or the xbindkeys utility. Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp-2.3.3 compile problem
Sven Neumann wrote: When trying to build gimp-2.3.3 - I just want to try the new SIOX based selection tool - I met the following compile problem: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o .libs/faxg3 faxg3.o g3.o run_tbl.o ../../libgimp/.libs/libgimp-2.0.so ../../libgimpcolor/.libs/libgimpcolor-2.0.so ../../libgimpbase/.libs/libgimpbase-2.0.so -L/usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so /home/steve/src/gimp-2.3.3/libgimpconfig/.libs/libgimpconfig-2.0.so.0: undefined reference to `gimp_matrix2_get_type' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Looks like that the dependency to libgimpmath is missing for several plugins. Have I missed something ? Might just be a bug but it will most likely be forgotten unless you file a bug report for it. Sven I like those kind of answers, really ... but there is no version 2.3.3 in the Bugzilla list. Most likely somebody has forgotten to create it ? Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Anti-Vignetting
Hi all, Recently I had to deal with a couple of images with signifcant vignetting in the corners: they were a few % darker. So, I was looking around for an adjustable anti-vignetting filter for Gimp, similar like that one for digikam. Any idea ? Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Anti-Vignetting
Hi all, If vignetting is perfectly radial, panotools is easy to setup and use. Bruno's tip with the gradient layer can fix even more difficult problems, e.g. when too dark areas aren't radial. Needs a bit more effort, though. Sven's idea sounds interesting but I haven't tried yet. I will keep this in mind. Thanks for all tips kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Gimp-2.3.4 problems
Hi all, I've installed gimp-2.3.4 right now and met another problem: all pull-down and pop-up menus do have a black background. Black fonts on black background is hard to read, I'm sure. Within the terminal a few message like this pop up: (gimp:23382): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_back_pixmap(): pixmap must have a colormap Any idea what went wrong here ? Regards, Stephan. p/s: glib is 2.8.2 gtk+ is 2.8.3 ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Decrease many image sizes
Carol Spears wrote: http://www.gimp.org/tutorials/Basic_Batch/ No, this is not _the_ way for this simple task. The approaches with the ImageMagick tools are much more simple and easier to handle. And: ImageMagick is part of many Linux distributions. So, really no need to dig into Script-Fu for this ... Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Run GIMP in batch mode ... HOW ?
Hi, There is a package called batchgimp on freshmeat. Basically it includes Perl scripts with embedded Script-Fu. I modified and used it once to convert a bunch of images to the Gimp pattern format (which cannot be done by Imagemagick, unfortunately). Another choice could be David's Batch Processor (dbp). It is a Gimp plugin and can be found at http://members.ozemail.com.au/~hodsond/dbp.html It allows preparing and starting predefined batch operations by using a little GUI. Regards, Stephan. KC wrote: Hi, Can I run GIMP in batch mode ? For example, I want to invoke GIMP from my application (written by C) via UNIX's pipe (or popen in C) ... How to do that ? Any example, tutorial will be appreciated. Thanks Regards KC ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Filter for inequality in microfilm brightness ?
s ver wrote: Digital photos taken from microfilm equipment in public libraries typically come up with inequality in brightness due to imperfect condenser lenses. Gives a bright center and dark corners. (sample at http://users.telenet.be/spica/trial/microfilm.jpg). Has anyone a filter to correct this? The Correct-Radial Luminance filter of Panorama Tools could be helpful in your case. Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Time to stick a fork in the GIMP?
Olivier Ripoll wrote: I was referring to the Michael's sentence about Bugzilla for threads concerning GIMPShop. I am trying to find such threads in Bugzilla, but I can't. You haven't tried, have you ? Point your browser to bugzilla.gnome.org and search for gimpshop. Voila: 309707. Regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] batch convert
Does ImageMagick support the xcf file format ? Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Adly Mabro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-07-06 22:48]: Does anyone know how I can convert a batch of .xcf files to .jpg? Use ImageMagick, put all in one directory and: for i in *.xcf; do convert $i `basename $i jpg`; done those are backtics before basename and after jpg. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: Fwd: [Gimp-user] Re: [magick-users] flatten not work
Hi, As Sven mentioned there a couple of those scripts on the web: shell scripts with embedded script-fu, pure script-fu, etc. Which one are you using ? If you use that one posted to http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/Gimp-Xcf-Image-Viewer-2399-1.html near the bottom of the page it should be obvious where to replace png with tif. Regards, Stephan. steven woody wrote: thank you. i have found the xcf2png and it works. the only question is how about if i want a xcf2tif? i think tiff is better than png, am i right? but since i don't familar with any of GIMP's script-Fu, i don't know how to modify the xcf2png. On 4/22/06, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, steven woody [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: :-( the same doesn't work for me. and, the 'display' can only display one layer of the image too. what's the cause ? the original three layers in the image was got from the 'decomposite' command of GIMP. ImageMagick simply doesn't implement all features of XCF since XCF is the native file format of GIMP and only GIMP supports it completely. If you want to flatten an XCF image or convert it to a different format, use GIMP for it. If you need to do this from the command-line, there are a couple of XCF to PNG converter scripts using the GIMP batch mode. Try to google for xcf2png. Sven -- woody ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10
Hi all,
I've seen this once and IIRC it turned out that my gimp-2.3 tried to load
libgimp / libgimpbase from version 2.2 which is still on the somewhere on
my Linux box.
I fixed this by installing gimp-2.3 completely under /usr/local/Gimp-2.3
and calling it by a little wrapper named gimpdev:
--
#!/bin/sh
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/Gimp-2.3/lib:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
/usr/local/Gimp-2.3/bin/gimp-2.3
--
The key is here that the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable must point to the right
libs.
Regards,
Stephan.
John R. Culleton wrote:
With both of these versions the program compiles clean and installs clean but
the following error occurs at runtime:
/usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3:
undefined symbol: gimp_env_init
I use Slackware Linux 10.2. the only recent change has been the addition of
freerock gnome, since Slackware Linux distros no longer include Gnome.
I have a version of 2.2.12 that works so I am not fussing with it :) But I
have had 2.3.x working before and I would like to continue with it.
Any suggestions?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10
Hi, Does this affect the functionality of gimp-2.3 ? In that case configure should not allow a --prefix=/usr/local/Gimp-2.3. And: it does not fix the problem what was mentioned on top of the thread. HTH ? No, it does not help at all. Regards, Stephan. Michael Schumacher wrote: Stephan Hegel wrote: I fixed this by installing gimp-2.3 completely under /usr/local/Gimp-2.3 and calling it by a little wrapper named gimpdev: The release notes suggest to use /opt/gimp-2.3, BTW. HTH, Michael ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10
Michael Schumacher wrote: You mean a GIMP 2.3 build with --prefix=/opt/gimp-2.3 still exhibits the same error on Slackware? Maybe this is something a Slackware user should investigate then. Even on my SuSE 10.0, this would cause the same problem as LD_LIBRARY_PATH does not point to /opt/gimp-2.3/lib by default. Therefore the loader would grab the wrong library again. It's not only a pure Slackware issue. Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10
Sven Neumann wrote: Not if you use the wrapper script that is suggested by the release notes and has already been mentioned here. Yes, I've posted a little wrapper by myself - you haven't read the whole thread carefully, have you ? Honestly: who is reading release notes ? This assumption is simply far from reality and real world does not work like this. Users/customers expect from release notes to get informed about changes, new features, etc. ... but not that they have to fiddle around with additional wrapper scripts to get the whole thing up and running. What they expect after installing is that the program is running out of the box. Right ? The problem is in the Gimp installation procedure itself ... Why not install an appropriate wrapper automatically after configure make make install and just tell the user to add the location of the wrapper to the PATH environment variable ? Or tell him to call it with the full path ? This is not only a problem of the development version of Gimp, this would happen with the stable version of Gimp as well when one decides to install it to a non-standard location. Regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10
Brendan wrote: I have to respectfully disagree here. When something is being released and it's not even production, then yes, you should read them. In reading them, you would discover the wrapper script. I know because this is how I discovered it, and I am not a Gimp devel, just a user. You are right: you _should_ read them. But reality is that only a few people do this. And finally we end up with threads like this where a program even does not start out of the box 'cause it's grabbing a wrong library. As I said the wrapper script is not only a problem of the development version, you need this wrapper also with the stable version of The Gimp when installing it in a non-standard location. Take an average Windows user: usually he runs an install.exe, can store the application at any place on his harddisks and at the end of this procedure the program often is even launched ... Done. Sorry, but I stick with my opinion that the problem is caused by the installation procedure of The Gimp. It should install the wrapper by itself. And it could be done easily: create a wrapper template, during make or make install replace the path with the --prefix passed from configure, install it and print a message where the wrapper is so that the user know what to invoke. Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10
Sven Neumann wrote: You are making a wrong assumption here about the target audience of a source release. Users are not the target audience. Users should grab a pre-compiled binary from their distributor or from someone who knows what he's doing and provides one for them. I consider myself belonging to the target audience. And I'm just a user. Who else shall fetch source code releases ? Developers go straight for the CVS repository anyway. There are more people in this thread who state to be just a user and do install source code releases. When you browse through the threads of the gimp-user list, there are also discussions about 2.3.x topics which is available as source code only. I do install Gimp source releases - on top of my favorite distribution 'cause it contains bug fixes I don't get quickly from the vendor. Or I like the latest Gimp but the distribution is not maintained anymore and I don't want to upgrade. Or I want to try brand-new features, e.g. the object extraction via Siox, etc. All the stuff which is not offered by an official distribution. I could imagine more use cases like this. The target audience of a source code release are people who are experienced in building software from source. They do appreciate the standard autoconf/automake based build and install procedures that GIMP provides. They would hate us if we deviated from this standard build process and started to install wrapper scripts. I'm sorry but why should they hate you ? They need the wrapper anyway as pointed out in the release notes. There are several other source code releases who provide wrappers to make sure that the application runs of the box after installation. They provide additional checks about the environment, check permissions, make sure that they access the right libraries to avoid unnecessary user confusion. Examples are Firefox, Thunderbird, the Wine applications, Tomboy, Beagle (in fact all Mono applications), etc. It does not break the mechanism of configure make make install as everything could be embedded fully transparent within this procedure, even the installation of a wrapper. The user even wouldn't notice. Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10
Tom Williams wrote: For the record folks, I've got Gimp 2.2.11 installed in /usr (came with my Linux distro) and Gimp 2.3.12 (used to have 2.3.11) installed in /usr/local/gimp-2.3 and I'm able to run either version without any problems, errors, or wrapper scripts (unless gimp-2.3 is a wrapper script). That's very interesting. Could you please post the output of echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and file /usr/local/gimp-2.3/bin/gimp-2.3 ? Thanks. I'm wondering how this works with multiple gimp libs. Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10
Saul Goode wrote: They don't necessarily *need* the wrapper (that is but one suggested solution to having multiple GIMPs installed concurrently) If you have another suggestion how to run multiple, library-wise incompatible instances of Gimp without using a wrappers, please let me know. Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10
Sven Neumann wrote: Why don't you just pass --enable-binreloc to configure and simply call the resulting binary directly? It will then figure out where to find the libraries and data files relative to the location of the binary. Thanks for this hint. Meanwhile I've solved the problem as described in an earlier posting, even without a wrapper. However, I will remember this option when I run in trouble again ... Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Paintbrush Tool Suggestion
Hi Raeth, May I ask what Ink tool settings you have used to achieve such smooth lines ? Thanks kind regards, Stephan. Raeth wrote: Greetings, When painting beneath lineart, I typically use the paintbrush tool set to a 100% hard brush and size variation. In GIMP I found the Paintbrush tool to be a bit inaccurate, which slowed down my process of blocking in colour. Due to this I tried blocking with the Ink tool and found it seemed not only more accurate, but produced a smoother size change with the tablet's pressure. See comparison: http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h243/Sliskerm/ink_paintbrush.png I was wondering if it would be possible to somehow merge the Ink and the Paintbrush tools (I'm not a programmer) so that one could paint with the varying size and/or opacity of the Paintbrush combined with the accuracy and smoothness of the Ink tool. In other words: Give the ink tool more pressure sensivity options and call it the new paintbrush tool. I have no idea how possible this would be, but it would be a great improvement to the GIMP's painting abilities. Raeth ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Editing image comment
Hi all, How can I edit an image comment in The Gimp ? I can display it in the Info window but haven't found a way to edit it. Even not in the last user manual ... Thanks kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Editing image comment
Hi Scott, Thanks for the quick reply. Scott Bicknell wrote: I don't know of a way to edit an existing image's comment, however. There appears to be no way to do that. But I may have overlooked something that someone else here can point out. This is exactly what I'm looking for. Meanwhile I've searched the Web and found a third party plugin at http://www.macgeisler.de/gimp/the_gimp.html called ecomment. Just for those of you who are interested in ... If there is no native way in The Gimp to edit existing comments I suggest to add this plugin (or a similar plugin) to the standard distribution. Regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Script-Fu error
Hi there, I've tried Gimp 2.3.15 with the following script: http://turtle.as.arizona.edu/jdsmith/exposure-blend.scm When launching Gimp I get the following error: script-fu-Warning: Error while executing (load /home/steve/.gimp-2.3/scripts/exposure-blend.scm) Error: set!: unbound variable: script-fu-exposure-blend-options The same plug-in behaves just fine in Gimp-2.2. Any hint what's wrong and/or how to track this down ? Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Script-Fu error
Hello Sven, Sven Neumann wrote: Since you are using the development version, you should be subscribed to the gimp-developer mailing-list. We haven't written a decent document describing the changes in Script-Fu yet, but you can read about them in the mailing-list archives. Thanks for the pointer. I've found the explanation in the mailing list archive. However, I do think the problem itself will be a user issue even when I'm a bit ahead at the moment and have tried the developer version already. When you release version 2.4 (or a release candidate of it) the problem will pop up for users: the new Script-Fu interpreter will lead to unexpected error messages with existing third party scripts. Any plans how to avoid this ? Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Vertical gradients
Hi Andrew, Andrew Scott wrote: Question: how do I apply a grey or neutral filter with a vertical gradient to the photograph? And how can this gradient be adjusted to suit? I checked the web site and documentation, but my time-limited search did not come up with anything. Might be this is helpful: http://www.gimpguru.org/Tutorials/NDFilter Regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] RAW format from digital camera.
Hi John, John R. Culleton wrote: I cannot find the sources for dcraw, only Mac and Wndoze binaries. I use Linux. Hints? http://cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw Search for dcraw.c - it is only this file. Regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] batch script for record covers
Hi Luigi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I'm running Linux but have **no** experience with ImageMagick. I'll try and follow your hint. This web page might be useful for a quick start: http://hoernle1.de/m/imagick6/ Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.2.15 Release
Victor Domingos wrote: Is it possible to support the Mac platform, too? That would be really cool... :) http://www.gimp.org/macintosh Rgds, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Corruption of Graphics Files
Hi, ASJF wrote: (I have also tried to open it with my favourite emacs... but it contains only @@@). If it contains only @s, what are you going to recover ? Rgds, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Batch processing in GIMP?
Hi, Robert Lindsey wrote: Hello, I just downloaded GIMP to a Windows XP computer. I have over 100 images that I would like to put a text layer on to label them before I upload them to a website. Is there a way to batch process this? I suggest to use Imagemagick for this. See: http://hoernle1.de/m/imagick6 . Check out #6 in the left column: annotating images. Rgds, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Using Wacom Graphire 4 in GIMP (Mac OS X/X11)
John R. Culleton wrote: And has anybody used a Wacom tablet with Gimp and Linux? I've used an older Intuos tablet, model GD-0608-R, serial interface with Gimp 2.2. Regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] What tablet provides pressure sensitivity when used with Gimp under Linux?
Johan Vromans wrote: Is that also true for the older (serial) versions? If so, how to enable this? Olivier provided you already a pointer to the Linux wacom project. It deals with serial tablets as well and everything is explained in detail there. Even an extra section is spend on how to enable this in The Gimp. So, why didn't you check this out ? Rgds, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP video podcast / screencast
Hi Rolf, First, thanks for the nice and educational video tutorials. After watching #1 to #3 I've re-configured The Gimp on my box ... representing now a similar layout like your's with just one toolbox window open including tabs for other dialogs like layers, channels, etc. in the lower pane. Neat and less space consuming. Also very helpful the hint with the TAB key to hide the toolbox window by tinkering with the window management settings. Unfortunately this influences also all other application windows: the Gimp window stays now on top even above xterm and other applications. An applicable workaround for me: I've created a new workspace dedicated solely to image manipulation works. As of the raw images mentioned in the episode #3: unfortunately you didn't explain in detail how you convert your 12 bit raw images into the 8 bit images. Just a guess: you did it with the (Windows ?) software which was shipped together with your camera. However, you have asked for a open source or at least a free tool: dcraw, ufraw (a Gimp plugin and as a stand-alone frontend to dcraw), rawstudio and Lightzone come to my mind. The latter is Java based and available for all mentioned OS but AFAIR free for Linux only. And just in case you should have some more time - Northern Germany is known for it's long lasting lousy weather ;) - you could make a videocast about how to make these nice videos. I know, it is not truly Gimp related but could inspire other folks to provide similar video tutorials. They are much easier to follow than written tutorials because one can really see what's going on without digging through the menus. More feedback after watching episodes #4+. Keep on going with this nice work - I would really appreciate it. Kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.3.18 and script-fu errors
David Woodfall wrote: I have just downloaded and tested two scripts and get the same error with each: Error: Set!: Unbound variable: new The scripts are gm-invert and gm-solarize. Is there some incompatability with newer versions of Gimp and these scripts? Is there an easy way to perhaps edit the scripts to get them working? AFAIK, the interpreter has changed. I've found the following on gimpusers.com regarding the upcoming 2.4 release: - script-fu migration howto A document, perhaps as part of the new website, that explains what needs to be done to fix scripts that fail to run correctly with GIMP 2.4. Perhaps also explain new features in 2.4 that are relevant for script authors. Point to documentation for Tiny-Fu. Don't know if the mentioned document has been written. However, the pointer to the tiny-fu docs could be helpful. Rgds, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4.x and xinput question
Hi all, I remember that I had to configure Gtk+ and Gimp with the option --with-xinput=xfree when I want to use a Wacom tablet in Gimp on a Linux box. Is this still true ? I can't find this option anymore when running ./configure --help. Regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4.x and xinput question
Hi all, Thanks to David and Sven for the quick reply. David Gowers wrote: GIMP has never had that configure option. You need to pass --with-xinput=yes to GTK+ to enable XInput support; where you got 'xfree' from baffles me. From the Linux Wacom Project HOWTO at http://linuxwacom.sourceforge.net/index.php/howto/gimp . Regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4.1 problems with openSuse 10.3
Hi, I've got the following problem with a self-compiled Gimp 2.4.1 on an openSuse 10.3 box (x86_64) when doing a simple File-New with no image open before: [prompt]/home/steve: gimp *** glibc detected *** gimp: double free or corruption (out): 0x037f2e40 *** Killed Glib2 and Gtk2 and the development packages are from the distribution itself: [prompt]/home/steve: rpm -q glib2 glib2-2.14.1-4 [prompt]/home/steve: rpm -q gtk2 gtk2-2.12.0-5.2 Somebody out there who can reproduce this ? Thanks kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4.1 problems with openSuse 10.3
Alex, All clear. Thanks for the rpm -q output. Exactly the same like on my box. Further analysis revealed: The problem is, that Gimp 2.4.1 tries to convert existing .gimp-2.2 resp. .gimp-2.3 directories to .gimp-2.4. This doesn't seem to be perfect. My guess (just a guess !): the templates aren't converted properly, that's why it fails when trying to open a new canvas with File-New. Removing all pre-existing .gimp-2.2 and .gimp-2.3 directories and letting Gimp create a brand-new .gimp-2.4 directory makes the problem disappearing. My configure options are the defaults (incl. python), except that I've chosen another --prefix. Kind regards, Stephan. Alex wrote: glib2-2.14.1-4 gtk2-2.12.0-5.2 (to complete the set:) glibc-2.6.1-18.3 gcc-4.2-24 kernel-default-2.6.22.9-0.4 --- Stephan Hegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Alex, Could you please invoke (see below) rpm -q glib2 rpm -q gtk2 for me and send me the output ? ... and I'll try your configuration options. Kind regards, Stephan. Alex wrote: Checked on openSuse 10.3 (x86_64, AMD) with last updates installed. Work fine, without described error. Configure options: --prefix=/home/alex/programs/gimp --disable-default-binary --disable-python --- Stephan Hegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've got the following problem with a self-compiled Gimp 2.4.1 on an openSuse 10.3 box (x86_64) when doing a simple File-New with no image open before: [prompt]/home/steve: gimp *** glibc detected *** gimp: double free or corruption (out): 0x037f2e40 *** Killed Glib2 and Gtk2 and the development packages are from the distribution itself: [prompt]/home/steve: rpm -q glib2 glib2-2.14.1-4 [prompt]/home/steve: rpm -q gtk2 gtk2-2.12.0-5.2 Somebody out there who can reproduce this ? Thanks kind regards, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user // Only the fireborn understand blue __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user // Only the fireborn understand blue __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Tiff and Ufraw plugin problem
Hi all, I've a file here which is identified as an tiff image by Imagemagick's identify, opens perfectly without any warning in xv, gqview and cinepaint but when I try to open it in Gimp the Ufraw plugin is launched. What could Gimp make thinking that this is a raw image file ... any idea ? Suspicious exif information ? Rgds, Stephan. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Tiff and Ufraw plugin problem
Hi all, Thanks for the replies, especially Sven's explanation and the pointer to pluginrc. Sven Neumann wrote: Certainly nothing with Exif. My guess is that the Ufraw plug-in claims responsibility for this file. Most probably the magic header that the ufraw loader registers matches for this file. This may be a bug in the Ufraw plug-in. You should contact the author. Well, I'd like to let you know that I've got a dcraw fix (via the hugin mailing list) which is supposed to solve the problem. I've checked it and it works for me now. Find the little patch below - in fact it is just one more check. However, please note that Ufraw / Ufraw-Gimp come with their own, slightly modified copy of draw. It is not enough to install a new dcraw, one has to fix the dcraw copy within the ufraw source package (the section is easy to find) and rebuild it. Rgds, Stephan. This patch fixes the problem. I ran it against my entire test suite to make sure it doesn't cause any other problems: --- dcraw.c 2008/03/05 01:29:34 1.399 +++ dcraw.c 2008/03/13 16:27:43 @@ -5358,6 +5358,7 @@ is_raw = 0; if (!dng_version tiff_bps == 8 tiff_compress == 1 tiff_ifd[raw].phint == 1) is_raw = 0; + if (tiff_bps == 8 tiff_samples == 4) is_raw = 0; for (i=0; i tiff_nifds; i++) if (i != raw tiff_ifd[i].samples == max_samp tiff_ifd[i].width * tiff_ifd[i].height / SQR(tiff_ifd[i].bps+1) This will be included in dcraw v8.84. Dave Coffin 3/13/2008 ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
