> I don't like how you nest the various let*-statements. That makes the
> code hard to track.
>
> It would be better if you have some dummy variable declarations in your
> outer let*-statement and then use set! to redefine the values.
>
> Also note that the use of "25" for the mode is not nice, you
with "catch", if I can't then I'll have to fix these corner cases.
Perhaps I'll make some patches for the function documentation if
people are interested.
Thomas
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Thomas DuBuisson
wrote:
> Update:
>
> 1) The question regarding exc
OBJECT (layer))'
failed
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Thomas DuBuisson
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am planning on evolving image transformations using an AST of the
> script-fu langauge and generating random (but syntatically correct)
> scripts. I would like to avoid
Hello list,
I am planning on evolving image transformations using an AST of the
script-fu langauge and generating random (but syntatically correct)
scripts. I would like to avoid programming in hundreds of corner
cases into the system and thus have the following questions:
1) Script-fu throws ex
