On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Kevin Myers wrote:
> Hi Marco -
>
> I've been working with some facets of digital images for a long time, but I
> still don't completely understand everything about transparency. In
> particular, you mention one of the things here that I am confused about
Hi,
"Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does the value of the alpha channel provide the transparency level
> for each pixel, and if so, then what does that have to do with
> "alpha"?
Your guess is right, or rather, almost right. The alpha channel
actually provides the opacity levels for
-
From: "Marco Wessel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] What happened to transparency after flatten?
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:32:13AM -0500, Albert Wagner wrote:
> > I have several laye
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:49:02 +0200
Marco Wessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah! That does it. Thank you, Marco.
--
Life is an offensive, directed against the repetitious mechanism of the
Universe.
--Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947)
___
Gimp
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:32:13AM -0500, Albert Wagner wrote:
> I have several layered images developed for an animation. I built them
> using a white background for ease in drawing. All other layers were
> transparent. For each I then deleted the background layer, flattened
> the image, and save
