On Wednesday 29 June 2005 01:14 pm, Simon Budig wrote:
John R. Culleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Earlier in my journey autogen.sh had complained about an
obsolete intltool so I installed version 32 of that package.
Did you rerun autogen.sh after updating intltool?
I removed the cvs/gimp
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 12:40, John R. Culleton wrote:
Back to the drawing board. :(
poor you :(. i am reading this thread with interest and am thinking of
having a go myself but i am reluctant to do this incase it overwrites my
current installation. can i install, or try to install the
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:55:16PM +0100, sam ende wrote:
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 12:40, John R. Culleton wrote:
Back to the drawing board. :(
poor you :(. i am reading this thread with interest and am thinking of
having a go myself but i am reluctant to do this incase it overwrites my
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:59:31PM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:40, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:52 am, John R. Culleton wrote:
thought it was time to rename the thread since I have gone past
the problems with pygtk.
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 03:59 pm, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:40, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:52 am, John R. Culleton wrote:
thought it was time to rename the thread since I have gone past
the problems with pygtk.
If
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 02:41 pm, John R. Culleton wrote:
upgraded to
version 32.1 That gave problems with both cvs downloads.
Now I have upgraded to 33 (which comes with the 2.3.1 gimp
tarball BTW) and now stable will compile and install without
complaint.
I still have the 2.3.1 tarball
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:46:12AM +, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 10:13 am, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 08:42 pm, Carol Spears wrote:
mr. culleton, i am going to respectfully ask the reason that after all
of this time you are not running a cvs
Hi,
John R. Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With other packages there is an overnight snapshot of the CVS,
bundled as tarball. Does such a facility exist for Gimp? Where?
That doesn't exist and it would be a terrible waste of bandwidth since
you are likely going to download that tarball
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 07:28 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
John R. Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With other packages there is an overnight snapshot of the CVS,
bundled as tarball. Does such a facility exist for Gimp? Where?
That doesn't exist and it would be a terrible waste of
Hi,
John R. Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not expert in CVS (translation, I just printed out the
manual this morning) but it seems that it is command line driven.
Do I sign on to a Gimp CVS server somewhere using telnet? If so
what is the address etc.?
This might be a good
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:13:28AM +, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 08:42 pm, Carol Spears wrote:
mr. culleton, i am going to respectfully ask the reason that after all
of this time you are not running a cvs version of gimp? you seem
overdue for this.
With
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:59, John R. Culleton wrote:
Am running 2.3.0 without incident. I downloaded 2.3.1 and
attempted to configure. I got a message about pygtk-2.0 missing.
What is this, is it essential and where can I find it?
Not a huge deal. 2.3.0 is OK.
From gimp 2.3.1 and ahead,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:59:24PM +, John R. Culleton wrote:
Am running 2.3.0 without incident. I downloaded 2.3.1 and
attempted to configure. I got a message about pygtk-2.0 missing.
What is this, is it essential and where can I find it?
i am not certain where to find this, however
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:59, John R. Culleton wrote:
Am running 2.3.0 without incident. I downloaded 2.3.1 and
attempted to configure. I got a message about pygtk-2.0 missing.
What is this, is it essential and where can I find it?
Not a huge deal. 2.3.0
14 matches
Mail list logo