Re: Bleeding edge, WAS [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-29 Thread John R. Culleton
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 01:14 pm, Simon Budig wrote: John R. Culleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Earlier in my journey autogen.sh had complained about an obsolete intltool so I installed version 32 of that package. Did you rerun autogen.sh after updating intltool? I removed the cvs/gimp

Re: Bleeding edge, WAS [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-29 Thread sam ende
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 12:40, John R. Culleton wrote: Back to the drawing board. :( poor you :(. i am reading this thread with interest and am thinking of having a go myself but i am reluctant to do this incase it overwrites my current installation. can i install, or try to install the

Re: Bleeding edge, WAS [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-29 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:55:16PM +0100, sam ende wrote: On Wednesday 29 June 2005 12:40, John R. Culleton wrote: Back to the drawing board. :( poor you :(. i am reading this thread with interest and am thinking of having a go myself but i am reluctant to do this incase it overwrites my

Re: Bleeding edge, WAS [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-29 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:59:31PM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:40, John R. Culleton wrote: On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:52 am, John R. Culleton wrote: thought it was time to rename the thread since I have gone past the problems with pygtk.

Re: Bleeding edge, WAS [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-29 Thread John R. Culleton
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 03:59 pm, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:40, John R. Culleton wrote: On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:52 am, John R. Culleton wrote: thought it was time to rename the thread since I have gone past the problems with pygtk. If

Re: Bleeding edge, WAS [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-29 Thread John R. Culleton
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 02:41 pm, John R. Culleton wrote: upgraded to version 32.1 That gave problems with both cvs downloads. Now I have upgraded to 33 (which comes with the 2.3.1 gimp tarball BTW) and now stable will compile and install without complaint. I still have the 2.3.1 tarball

Re: [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-28 Thread Manish Singh
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:46:12AM +, John R. Culleton wrote: On Tuesday 28 June 2005 10:13 am, John R. Culleton wrote: On Tuesday 14 June 2005 08:42 pm, Carol Spears wrote: mr. culleton, i am going to respectfully ask the reason that after all of this time you are not running a cvs

Re: [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, John R. Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With other packages there is an overnight snapshot of the CVS, bundled as tarball. Does such a facility exist for Gimp? Where? That doesn't exist and it would be a terrible waste of bandwidth since you are likely going to download that tarball

Re: [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-28 Thread John R. Culleton
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 07:28 pm, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, John R. Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With other packages there is an overnight snapshot of the CVS, bundled as tarball. Does such a facility exist for Gimp? Where? That doesn't exist and it would be a terrible waste of

Re: [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, John R. Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am not expert in CVS (translation, I just printed out the manual this morning) but it seems that it is command line driven. Do I sign on to a Gimp CVS server somewhere using telnet? If so what is the address etc.? This might be a good

Re: [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-28 Thread Carol Spears
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:13:28AM +, John R. Culleton wrote: On Tuesday 14 June 2005 08:42 pm, Carol Spears wrote: mr. culleton, i am going to respectfully ask the reason that after all of this time you are not running a cvs version of gimp? you seem overdue for this. With

Re: [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-14 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:59, John R. Culleton wrote: Am running 2.3.0 without incident. I downloaded 2.3.1 and attempted to configure. I got a message about pygtk-2.0 missing. What is this, is it essential and where can I find it? Not a huge deal. 2.3.0 is OK. From gimp 2.3.1 and ahead,

Re: [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-14 Thread Carol Spears
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:59:24PM +, John R. Culleton wrote: Am running 2.3.0 without incident. I downloaded 2.3.1 and attempted to configure. I got a message about pygtk-2.0 missing. What is this, is it essential and where can I find it? i am not certain where to find this, however

Re: [Gimp-user] pygtk and 2.3.1

2005-06-14 Thread Eric P
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:59, John R. Culleton wrote: Am running 2.3.0 without incident. I downloaded 2.3.1 and attempted to configure. I got a message about pygtk-2.0 missing. What is this, is it essential and where can I find it? Not a huge deal. 2.3.0