On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Mick Raynes wrote:
cameras with different settings. Our aim would be to reduce the original
jpg 1000 by 1000 and 120kb (as an eg) to a png 500 by 500 and about 30kb.
As an example we have posted an original jpg image on the net at
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Mick Raynes wrote:
Thanks Andrew. With indexing we can reduce them to around 70kb? Any other
suggestions then for compression of those images to around 30kb which we can
use the gd library or imagemagick to convert to thumbnails?
You can reduce them quite a bit by
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Jonathan Gift wrote:
If you know a way, please share. If not, Ximian is thataway.
Once you've installed the Ximian Gnome packages, you should be able to
build Gimp 1.2 (assuming you install the Ximian -dev packages) on potato.
later,
Andrew
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Jonathan Gift wrote:
Um, interesting. But I haven't installed Ximian and I don't intend to.
If it was just Perl, it's one thing. I have a nasty feeling that once I
upgraded perl, it would be something else. If someone has successfully
done it against potato then I'd
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Jonathan Gift wrote:
Ximian doesn't, compiling does. I thought we were talking about that.
It's why I didn't compile but got the Ximian package. It required gimp
and a few new files. That was it.
I am talking about compiling it. I built all the Woody Gimp 1.2 packages
I have built Gimp 1.2 packages for Debian Potato systems that have Ximian
Gnome installed (Ximian was formerly known as Helix Code).
I've put a link to the Ximian installation directions (really just a line
to add to /etc/apt/sources.list) up along with the gimp 1.2 packages at:
/gimp-data-extras - you should find both the
binary packages and the source there.
later,
Andrew Kieschnick
On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 07:53:31 -0600 (CST), Andrew Kieschnick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If the problem is caused by a BUG is your ***, then its a solution,
and the selection problem is caused by buggy window managers. I know
kwm and icewm both
On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Amy Abascal wrote:
Yes, don't just delete the background and save the image on a transparent
background. The image will not have anything to dither with and will
therefore be "ragged". Instead,
1. Set your background color to a color that matches (or closely
the image to fill 100% of the page.
You can set this to whatever value you like (in percent or in pixels per
inch) with the scaling control in the print dialog.
later,
Andrew Kieschnick
10 matches
Mail list logo
