RE: Batch Image Processing

2000-07-07 Thread Ryan Alexander Neily


Dear Steve,
I don't know about others but I for one would appreciate seeing
your script. 

 .^. Ryan Neily
 /V\   
// \\   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   LINUX   /(   )\ 
^^-^^   http://cnet.windsor.ns.ca/Art/Neily
 POWERED   


On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Steve Hitchner wrote:

 
 Just wanted to thank everyone for their responses to my batch processing
 question. I was able to write a very simple perl script using the
 tifftopnm/pnmscale/pnmtopng commands.  Thanks again for all your help.
 
 cheers
 steve
 
 ==
 Stephen Hitchner   http://www.algae.dhs.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming soon http://www.greenalgae.net
 




Re: making a transparent png

2000-05-20 Thread Ryan Alexander Neily


I just tried viewing a `transparent.png` in ee version03 and it showed up
transparent. Ditto in ImageMagick 4.2.9 display. Most of my images are
created with GIMP.

 .^. Ryan Neily
 /V\   
// \\   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   LINUX   /(   )\ 
^^-^^   http://cnet.windsor.ns.ca/Art/Neily
 POWERED   


On Sat, 20 May 2000, Ben Skelton wrote:

 On Sat, 20 May 2000, Wandered Inn wrote:
  Ben Skelton wrote:
   Hi all
  
   I am having real trouble making transparent pngs. My lovely airbrushed
   art is turned into ugly solid (opaque) colour when I save as a png. Is
   there a trick, or a RightWay, to make these things? Maybe I have some
   broken software, I am running gimp as per suse 6.4.
 
  What are you trying to view it with?  Netscape does not properly display
  transparency in pngs.  Mozilla does.
 
 I have tried viewing the png in ImageMagic's display, sketch, and various kde 
 graphic tools. ee displays nothing. The only app I have which displays gimp 
 greated pngs correctly is gimp.
 
 Could I have a broken libpng? Does gimp use this or its own?
 
 --Ben
 




Re: Just beginning

2000-05-05 Thread Ryan Alexander Neily



On Fri, 5 May 2000, Ben FrantzDale wrote:

 Unless something has been changed, I think this is incorrect. In every
 version of GIMP I've ever used, undo undoes only the most recent action. You
 can hit undo more times to get more layers of undo but you'll still only be
 undoing one action at a time. If you save along the way then there's a
 revert option that will drop back to the saved version but that's certainly
 not wat undo does.
 
 --Ben

Nothing has changed, I wrote my explanation the way I did because it
wasn't clear how many times `undo` was being hit but Leanne was getting
back to `no work` left. I thought getting into saving her work could
ultimately save on grief :^)

 .^. Ryan Neily
 /V\   
// \\   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   LINUX   /(   )\ 
^^-^^   http://cnet.windsor.ns.ca/Art/Neily
 POWERED