Nat --
Just in case you miss it (like I did the first time I went hunting
for the options page) --
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Olivier wrote:
> At the end of your own message, you find the link you need:
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
You have to scroll down below
Ok -- I believe PS is beating align_image_stack because the picture
seems to have been taken with a very wide lens (i.e. short focal length)
from close up... as a result, there is a lot of barrel distortion, and
in addition there is a lot of camera movement between frames, so the
result is that
On 03/27/2017 12:14 AM, Ross Martinek wrote:
> have an .xcf file that is supposed to contain some 300 layers.
> However, today when I opened it, it says the file has the correct
> number of layers, but the Layers tab is grayed or blued out, and none
> of the layers appear.The file was fine when
Liquid Rescale is not part of the GIMP project, it's a plugin made by a
third party. We don't have a new download for you, only what you can find
at http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com.
Alex
26 марта 2017 г. 23:53 пользователь "Debra Freeman"
написал:
> I can't load liquid scaler, is there a new d
>No. Or, more accurately, not yet. But people are working hard on this
>(a.k.a. non-destructive editing)
Thanks! Is this going to be in 2.10?
--
AgeOfAsparagus (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-l
I have an .xcf file that is supposed to contain some 300 layers. However, today
when I opened it, it says the file has the correct number of layers, but the
Layers tab is grayed or blued out, and none of the layers appear.The file was
fine when I worked on it yesterday. Opening a backup file has
have an .xcf file that is supposed to contain some 300 layers. However, today
when I opened it, it says the file has the correct number of layers, but the
Layers tab is grayed or blued out, and none of the layers appear.The file was
fine when I worked on it yesterday. Opening a backup file has
On 26/03/17 23:14, AgeOfAsparagus wrote:
HI!
Is there a way to create a live/active drop shadow filter, that changes when the
layer it is acting on also changes?
For example, If I have an empty layer with this "live" filter active on it
(whether it's part of a layer group or the layer above or
HI!
Is there a way to create a live/active drop shadow filter, that changes when the
layer it is acting on also changes?
For example, If I have an empty layer with this "live" filter active on it
(whether it's part of a layer group or the layer above or some sort of bump map
thingy), then when I
* Debra Freeman [03-26-17 16:53]:
> I can't load liquid scaler, is there a new download
my car won't start. why!
really, you might give just a little information about your operating
system, gimp version, where you got it, how you installed it,
crystal balls are really in short supply th
I can't load liquid scaler, is there a new download
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-use
>Still not very clear... The Layers that can be used as a map in
>Filter>Map>Displace must have the same size as the target layer. Those
>that don't are filtered out of the selector.
>I don't see the connection with Filters>Map>Displace. The "standard"
>Filters>Generic menu contains, from memory:
>This is a mailing list.
>
>A third party has decided to expose it as a forum.
That is why I generally only reply to posts that are obviously from people who
signed up for the forum.
Made an exception for exalted member of Gimp community.
Perhaps it would be better if the mailing list completely
On 03/26/2017 04:43 PM, rich2005 wrote:
> Yes, the mailing list format is terrible for a forum.
This is a mailing list.
A third party has decided to expose it as a forum.
--
Regards,
Michael
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD
___
>Sounds complicated for my very basic knowledge. I do not know how to
>'stack' or add a 'black layer' and the restpaint out with a fuzzy
>brush or where to access the sharpen dialogue.
>
>I would really like to know how you got two images included with your
>post; having a real problem understa
>There are all sorts of ways to get a result from the original. In the
>eye of the beholder comes into play as well.
>
>I would do something like.
>
>Scale original to 1920x1080. (1)
>
>As another image scale original 1440x1080 Preserving proportions (2)
>
>Stack the images (2) on top of (1) and ad
On Sunday 26 March 2017 14:12:59 Scott Jacobs via gimp-user-list wrote:
> I see you did actually crop some off the top, bottom and sides...
>
> Did you notice that the artist's signature is almost completely gone?
That, to me, is sort of a no-no. I'd try to pick that up and move it back
to full
I see you did actually crop some off the top, bottom and sides...
Did you notice that the artist's signature is almost completely gone?
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mail
On 25/03/17 07:34, crj414 wrote:
I posted a similar question before but I think I gave too much detail and it
wasnt clear. When I choose displace under map not all the layers show up.
Still not very clear... The Layers that can be used as a map in
Filter>Map>Displace must have the same size as
* Nate Owens [03-26-17 08:54]:
> I want to stop getting email; notifications, all and everything gimp
> related
> How do I get off and out of this?
> thanks
>
> *Nate Owens*
> www.nateowens.com
> nateowen...@gmail.com
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing
At the end of your own message, you find the link you need:
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
2017-03-26 14:51 GMT+02:00 Nate Owens :
> I want to stop getting email; notifications, all and everything gimp
> related
> How do I get off and out of this?
> thanks
>
> *Nate Ow
I want to stop getting email; notifications, all and everything gimp
related
How do I get off and out of this?
thanks
*Nate Owens*
www.nateowens.com
nateowen...@gmail.com
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List
>Hey, thanks for that!
>
>Follows Flickr album https://flic.kr/s/aHskT2xjh1
EDIT: I noticed that Flickr automatically changed the tiffs I uploaded into
jpgs, so I wanted to make sure it wouldn't be a waste of time to you.
I did what I suppose you'll do:
1 - Downloaded Flickr album
2 - Aligned the
Thank you Ofnuts! Worked like a charm!
--
ottenm (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://m
>I'm having a problem, I think, uploading more than one image. Is it
>possible to upload more than one image?
>I'm new to this forum, first post.
--
fenpeppertree (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-
>Did you try with a lower-than-default -g? E.g. "-g 3"?
>
>If you want to upload the base .tif files somewhere, I can try to
>align
>them, so we can see if there is some strange difference between
>align_image_stack on our machines.
>
>-c
Hey, thanks for that!
Follows Flickr album https://flic.kr
Here is the in-between image for the other two. The one with the 'ovalish' moon.
Attachments:
*
http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/527/original/HALLOWEEN_TRICK_OR_TREATERS___SCALED_TO_1920_x_1080_.jpg
--
fenpeppertree (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
_
I'm have a problem, I think, uploading more than one image. Is it possible to
upload more than one image?
I'm new to this forum, first post.
--
fenpeppertree (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@
>Here is the in-between image for the other two. The one with the
>'ovalish' moon.
There are all sorts of ways to get a result from the original. In the eye of the
beholder comes into play as well.
I would do something like.
Scale original to 1920x1080. (1)
As another image scale original 1440x
>Thanks to all for the input, but since there was like 'zero' negative
>space for the image, cropping of any sort didn't really work.
>
>What I ended up doing was selecting the moon with the 'elliptical'
>tool (from the new 1920 x 1080 image) then copying and pasting it into
>a 'new' file. From her
>Not if you are changing the proportions of the image as a whole: The
>moon will change to conform to the new aspect ratio. But you can
>scale
>the source image to your desired height or width, keeping the original
>aspect ratio, then crop the image to the desired width or height. Try
>it both w
31 matches
Mail list logo