Thanks for that Elle, I followed up personally about the profiles.
Going back to the list, one thing I should add is that currently for my
workflow on the same machine I'm using Gimp 2.8 with the same sized
images, same monitor profiles, and it works more or less okay. I
wouldn't say it's
On 03/27/2018 09:35 PM, Robert Bieber wrote:
How would I tell? I just generated my monitor profiles with Ubuntu's
color management control panel section: I'm still not as much of a
power-user in that area as I'd like to be
So is there any chance that your monitor profile at home is a LUT
How would I tell? I just generated my monitor profiles with Ubuntu's
color management control panel section: I'm still not as much of a
power-user in that area as I'd like to be
So is there any chance that your monitor profile at home is a LUT
profile? What about the image's assigned
On 03/27/2018 09:11 PM, Robert Bieber wrote:
I assume this has to be a bug, since I'm running the same software and
getting the exact opposite of the results I'd expect running it on
different machines, but what can I do to diagnose it and get some data
that might help resolve it? The error
This morning I saw the new RC was out, and just to do a quick check on
performance I downloaded it on my work laptop, loaded a large (~40MP)
image, and did some quick operations to see how things shook out.
Everything was pretty smooth, even better than the current stable
version on my
On Tuesday 27 March 2018 00:29:37 Elle Stone wrote:
> On 03/26/2018 08:02 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> > There is also a release announcement onwww.gimp.org
> > with screenshots of new features:
> >
> > https://gimp.org/news/2018/03/26/gimp-2-10-rc1-released/
>
> At least on my computer, above
