On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:13 AM Alexandre Prokoudine via gimp-user-list <
gimp-user-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> If it's color selection dialog (e.g. what you get when you
> double-click on the foreground color in the toolbox), then your only
> option to get better precision right now is to switch
On 10/01/2020 12:00, gimp-user-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 3:45 AM Ofnuts wrote:
I would strongly advise using the Pixel option instead. It gives
exactly the precision of the actual pixel data.
So if the image is 16-bit float, this will yield
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 9:23 PM Elliott Balsley wrote:
> > I would strongly advise using the Pixel option instead. It gives
> > exactly the precision of the actual pixel data.
> >
> > So if the image is 16-bit float, this will yield
> > (0,014557;0,053680;0,827148) for what is (32;66;235) in RGB.
A bit more
The name rang a bell from gimpchat.com
Really do need more information. Seems you are using Windows but is it 32 bit or
64bit? (Win 7 or 10 or something else?)
You can get DBP working Gimp 2.8 / Windows (64 bit) with a few extra files see:
screenshot 1 but really not advisable. DBP
>Hello. What does work with Gimp 2.8 ? I just tried David's plug
>in. It
>doesn't show up in filters. I guess it doesn't work.
>
>I just (currently) want to crop a large number of pics. If there's no
>gimp
>batch is there a third party thing, an alternative graphics prog or
>something?
>
> >BIMP does not work with Gimp 2.10 and it is not possible to do a batch
> >resize of images.
> >
> >This is pretty unacceptable in 2018 from a program of such a great
> >quality.
Hello,
I'm not sure why an obsolete thread from 2018 is being brought back to
life, but just to point out: BIMP 2.0
>Hi all,
>BIMP does not work with Gimp 2.10 and it is not possible to do a batch
>resize of images.
>
>This is pretty unacceptable in 2018 from a program of such a great
>quality.
>
>Is there someone working on this feature?
>Isn't it time to include this feature in the official gimp without the
>I have been writing code since the 1970's. I've seen numerous attempts
>to replace code written in a text editor by code generated by clicking
>in graphical interfaces, possibly under the assumption that this could
>be used by non-programmers and therefore get rid of that costly
>programmers
