On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Maurizio Loreti
wrote:
>
> > On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist wrote:
> >
> > Pat—
> >
> > thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a
> hard nut
> > to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw
> in the
> > pr
> On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist wrote:
>
> Pat—
>
> thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a hard nut
> to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw in the
> previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to use.
Hello -
Pat—
thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a hard nut
to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw in the
previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to use.
I will look at the alternatives you suggested.
Regards,
Glen
>I
It may be easier (or make more sense) to use one of the newer raw
processing softwares available? They are a little more actively developed
and will likely support newer cameras better. There's:
darktable: https://www.darktable.org
RawTherapee: http://www.rawtherapee.com
Each of these will let
Dear GIMP-ers—
I am running GIMP 2.8.20 on a Mac with Mavericks (Mac OS 10.9.5).
The previous version, 2.4, automatically included Ufraw and would open the .RW2
files from my Panasonic Lumix camera. (I was really impressed that it did.)
I now must install Ufraw for the newest GIMP, but for my li
