[Gimp-user] HELP - "ps" and "eps" load and save
Hi having the exact same problem, could you post the solution here if you found one? >For some reason, your message has appeared 15 hours late. I just saw >it. > >Please contact me at the email address posted on my website. > >Thanks, >Partha -- shasselbaeck (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] HELP - "ps" and "eps" load and save
Having the exact same proble, could you post your solution here if you found one? >Hallo to everyone..!! this was my first post. >I'm a long long long time enthusiast Gimp user, i use it for work, i'm >web developer and web graphics designer. I've ever used Gimp on Linux >distribution and often on Windows machines. > >NOW (for my huge trouble) i'm using a Mac PRO with OS Sierra >distribution. >(no comment on this) > >I'm surprise but with the Mac version i can't load the file-eps and >file-ps load and save procedures ... >i've installed the latest Ghostscript enviroment, and all the >postscript binding is correctly installed on this damned OS Sierra. > >the only solution i've find was to use (instead of the official Gimp >for Mac 2.8) the Partha versione of Gimp..: the McGimp 2.8 > >with this "gimp distribution" the "procedures" for loading and saving >with postscript was correctly loaded and work well. >But McGimp have a graphic issue that make "Gimp" vary hard to use.. >the panel window disappear any time you click outside the image window >:( > >Someone of you have any advice to give me..? >On this anbearable Mac machine i've got also the whole Adobe Creative >Cloud suite.. but Gimp works better for a wide range of situation and >it result faster and more friendly than Adobe Apps... don't tell to me >to convert in ps o eps with other software, i can do it but i DON'T >WANT to DO it. > >Thanks to all for replies.. >(GIMP RULES 4EVER) -- shasselbaeck (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Printing 24" x 36"
Problem Solved. I developed the plan in Inkscape then exported as a PDF. Also, opened the .svg file in GIMP and rendered a few of the circles as shrubs and saved that as PDF as well. Both printed with crisp lines and no pixelation or artifacts. Thanks Rick! >In GIMP try 600 or 1200 dpi. >Otherwise, use a vector program like Inkscape (at 600 dpi) which can >be >exported as a PDF. > >Rick S. > >-Original Message- >From: 21stDigitalBoy >Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 11:20 AM >To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org >Cc: notificati...@gimpusers.com >Subject: [Gimp-user] Printing 24" x 36" > >When printing engineering/architectural prints at 24" x 36" the prints >show >pixelation around all of the lines. I saved the image as .png at 300 >DPI. > >I use Staples for my printing and they turn the .png into a PDF before >printing. > >I'm curious if I should be exporting as s a .tiff or another file >format. > >And what resolution should I set? > >Is the issue caused by transparency, RGB? > >I've attached images of the prints that show the pixelation/artifacts. > >Attachments: >* >http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/489/original/IMG_20170224_105240816.jpg >* >http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/490/original/IMG_20170224_105248610.jpg >* >http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/491/original/IMG_20170224_110838403.jpg -- 21stDigitalBoy (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
