When trying to compile on Raspbian (debian) Stretch, I am not able to
install all the deps:
- Error: missing dependency babl >= 0.1.52
- Error: missing dependency gegl-0.4 >= 0.4.4
- Error: missing dependency glib >= 2.54.2
*** Test for GLIB failed
- Error: missing dependency gegl
Hallo Gimp team
Problem beim Speichern in xcf mit Hilfslinien
Problem saving in xcf with guides
Gimp 2.10.4 Windows 10
Wenn man neue Hilfslinien verwendet und dann „Speichern“ oder „Speichern
unter“ möchte, entsteht die Gimp-Meldung
If you use new guides and then want to "Save" or "Save
>I'm not sure I'd go even that big. The original was twice that
>resolution and had a lot less JPEG artifacting.
>
>Actually... you might be going about this all wrong. If you really
>want
>to use this to produce a very large physical print, I would consider
>embracing that the original image is
>I'm not sure I'd go even that big. The original was twice that
>resolution and had a lot less JPEG artifacting.
>
>Actually... you might be going about this all wrong. If you really
>want
>to use this to produce a very large physical print, I would consider
>embracing that the original image is
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 02:31:37PM -0400, Matthew Woehlke via gimp-user-list
wrote:
> On 2018-08-13 13:09, Partha Bagchi via gimp-user-list wrote:
> > The image is 2048x1536 (3.1 MP). Best you can hope for is an 8 by 10.
> > That's inches. If you are willing to sacrifice quality further you can
On 08/13/18 17:31, gitt97 wrote:
Hey guys,
So I was using stroke path normally and then I accidentally clicked selection
from path and I undid thatbut now when I draw a path and then click stroke
path nothing shows up.
Can anyone help???
-M
Make sure that:
1. there is no selection
On 08/13/18 20:31, Matthew Woehlke via gimp-user-list wrote:
On 2018-08-13 13:09, Partha Bagchi via gimp-user-list wrote:
The image is 2048x1536 (3.1 MP). Best you can hope for is an 8 by 10.
That's inches. If you are willing to sacrifice quality further you can try
printing in 150dpi which
On 2018-08-13 13:09, Partha Bagchi via gimp-user-list wrote:
> The image is 2048x1536 (3.1 MP). Best you can hope for is an 8 by 10.
> That's inches. If you are willing to sacrifice quality further you can try
> printing in 150dpi which would give you 14 by 10.
I'm not sure I'd go even that big.
>Here is one that was taken from my camera and edited in Lightroom. I
>have no idea how large this would be able to be printed. Do you? Is
>there anywhere online I can submit several pictures to see how large
>they can be made without losing quality? I really want to use this
>picture somehow!
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 01:04 +0200, Rodolfo Medina via gimp-user-list
wrote:
>
> I'm
> embedding that picture in a pdf file after converting into eps
> format. [...] The picture is a photo, that
> I have in its original jpg format..., 12MB big.
That's not very large for a print-resolution
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 06:39:15PM +0100, Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list wrote:
>
> As to Nick's question - the "things" in the middle of the pier
> (bump-stops?) are probably the limiting factor, together with how
> close you are when you view it.
I forgot to say that I was looking at an
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 01:00:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 12 August 2018 18:21:33 nickib wrote:
>
> > >I had a friend play with both the iPhone images and the camera images
> > >using Lightroom. Would it be ok if I uploaded both the RAW (KDC)
> > >images and the ones she edited to
On Sunday 12 August 2018 18:21:33 nickib wrote:
> >I had a friend play with both the iPhone images and the camera images
> >using Lightroom. Would it be ok if I uploaded both the RAW (KDC)
> >images and the ones she edited to get a better idea of what
> >enlargement IS possible? I’m at the point
The image is 2048x1536 (3.1 MP). Best you can hope for is an 8 by 10.
That's inches. If you are willing to sacrifice quality further you can try
printing in 150dpi which would give you 14 by 10.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:42 PM nickib wrote:
> >I had a friend play with both the iPhone images
"Rick Strong" writes:
> If you are going to have your image printed, you probably need it in the CMYK
> colour space at 300 dpi. Which may mean that the file the printer gets should
> be a TIF image file. The first rule is always: "What does your printer want?".
>
> Expectations vary between
Thank you for all your help
Regards,
Gord
-Original Message-
From: Liam R E Quin [mailto:l...@holoweb.net]
Sent: 2018/08/10 7:45 PM
To: Gordon Caines; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Source of photos
On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 13:09 +, Gordon Caines wrote:
> Hello:
>
Hey guys,
So I was using stroke path normally and then I accidentally clicked selection
from path and I undid thatbut now when I draw a path and then click stroke
path nothing shows up.
Can anyone help???
-M
--
gitt97 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
Thank you for all your help
Regards,
Gord
From: Pat David [mailto:patda...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2018/08/10 4:42 PM
To: Gordon Caines
Cc: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Source of photos
GIMP doesn’t really have any sort of photo management functionality built in
(not should it in
>I had a friend play with both the iPhone images and the camera images
>using Lightroom. Would it be ok if I uploaded both the RAW (KDC)
>images and the ones she edited to get a better idea of what
>enlargement IS possible? I’m at the point where even if I cannot use
>it for the 48x24 size it’s
19 matches
Mail list logo
