On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Mark Morin wrote:
> Photoshop is not the gold standard by which all other programs are to be
> evaluated.
It is. Sadly so.
> One could just as legitimately ask why photoshop's UI is not
> like gimp's
1. Photoshop predates GIMP by 10+ years
2. GIMP contributors
>Good point -whether a user thinks Krita or GIMP is "more like
>PhotoShop"
>might depend on which version of Photoshop they've used. I'm only
>familiar with one version of PhotoShop, and that's CS2 on Windows.
>Maybe
>PhotoShop on Mac has a substantially different UI, and maybe CC looks
On 02/12/2017 01:02 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Elle Stone
wrote:
[...]
Does anyone have any possible explanations for why different people with a
background using PhotoShop have such wildly diverse reactions to the GIMP
and Krita User
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Weird forum and layout
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Elle Stone
<ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com> wrote:
[...]
Does anyone have any possible explanations for why different people with a
background using PhotoShop have such wildly diverse reactions to the GIMP
and Krit
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Elle Stone
wrote:
> [...]
> Does anyone have any possible explanations for why different people with a
> background using PhotoShop have such wildly diverse reactions to the GIMP
> and Krita User Interfaces?
version of Photoshop?
On 11/02/17 14:58, Boxman wrote:
Man, I'm having trouble understanding the layout of this website and forums, as
well as the design philosophy behind GIMP user interface.
For starters, on the home page its hard to tell what the content is when so much
of it looks like advertisements. Then, on
Elle,
Pat, do you know who actually owns/runs gimpusers.com? There doesn't
seem to be an "about" link anywhere (or else I missed it). Same question
and comment applies to gimpchat.com - I don't see an "about" link.
I don't know who runs gimpusers.com, and gmipchat.com recently changed
owners.
On 02/11/2017 09:05 AM, Pat David wrote:
This is not a forum, it's a bridge to a traditional mailing list that can
be found here:
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Or you can use the archives to see threaded conversations:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
On 02/11/2017 08:58 AM, Boxman wrote:
Like GIMP itself, I don't understand why the developers would want
to create something so different from what we are familiar with, and have
invested huge amounts of time learning, so that to use GIMP we now have to
relearn everything we thought we knew.
Boxman (for...@gimpusers.com) wrote:
> For starters, on the home page its hard to tell what the content is when so
> much
> of it looks like advertisements. Then, on the forums, only bits and pieces of
> them are shown.
gimpusers.com is not an official gimp forum. In fact on our official web
Typo in the URL: https://www.gimp.org
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 8:05 AM Pat David wrote:
> This is not a forum, it's a bridge to a traditional mailing list that can
> be found here:
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
>
> Or you can use the archives to
This is not a forum, it's a bridge to a traditional mailing list that can
be found here:
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Or you can use the archives to see threaded conversations:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
This website is _not_ run by the official
Man, I'm having trouble understanding the layout of this website and forums, as
well as the design philosophy behind GIMP user interface.
For starters, on the home page its hard to tell what the content is when so much
of it looks like advertisements. Then, on the forums, only bits and pieces of
13 matches
Mail list logo