Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with script-
fu?
I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be
noticeably lagged.
I am running 2.8.16 on OSX.
-u
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:
On 22/03/16 12:27, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with script-
fu?
I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be
noticeably lagged.
I am running 2.8.16 on OSX.
-u
A script is normally just glue around operations
I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable
lag when executing python-fu.
E.g., when I run Akkana Peck's show_py_ui.py plugin, and compare this
with GIMP.org's test-sphere.scm script there is a big difference in
performance up to launcing the UI. I note
On 22/03/16 21:34, Kevin Cozens wrote:
On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable
lag when executing python-fu.
Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python
scripts the Python interpreter must
As you haven't provided a link to Akkana's script, we have no way to compare if
the scripts are even remotely similar.
My experience with writing a script in Scheme, then converting it to Python was
that it runs considerably faster in Python, so I think it's as Ofnuts says,
it's entirely
On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable
lag when executing python-fu.
Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python scripts
the Python interpreter must be loaded before it can run the script.
