On 02/18/2012 04:01 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
Actually I use semantic markup via standards compliant xhmtl 1.0 and
CSS 2.1. As an example, the pages in my silly little personal site
look and work the same in Firefox, Opera, Chrome, Safari, Epiphany,
Konqueror, Midori and IE8. I did not have to tw
On 02/18/2012 04:16 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> On 12-02-16 06:20 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>> Usage is down to something around 5% on most sites I have seen
>> recent statistics for. Considering the security aspect, it's really
>> not doing anyone a favor to support IE6 any more... But the moment
>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Frank Gore wrote:
> Right, it's not like these new-fangled standards like HTML5 can
> possibly have any positive effect on a user's experience. Let's all
> cripple our work in an effort to support old, unmaintained, insecure
> browsers. In fact, we should ENCOURAGE
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> If you are using some fancy features on a web page it may not be as easy to
> have the same level of compatability across multiple browsers on multiple
> operating systems without some conditional code but the amount of browser
> specific chec
On 12-02-16 06:20 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
Usage is down to something around 5% on most sites I have seen
recent statistics for. Considering the security aspect, it's really
not doing anyone a favor to support IE6 any more... But the moment
I stop writing alternate style sheets for it,
If you
Wow, thank you all so much for the helpful,
detailed responses. What a nice body of background
for me to work from. I worked for a long time in Photoshop
for print, but not web stuff.
Thanks again. I love this gimp list...
Have a great week and weekend.
Dan
_
On 02/16/2012 08:59 PM, Burnie West wrote:
>>> create artifacts - or so it seems to me.
>> I did not know that jpg had an indexed mode. I knew I would be
>> getting some interesting feedback when I posted that answer.
>
> I didn't mean to imply that jpg has an indexed mode. It just seems
> to me i
On 02/16/2012 03:20 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
On 02/16/2012 05:25 PM, Burnie West wrote:
On 02/16/2012 01:54 PM, Frank Gore wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Xiella
Harksell wrote:
As a point of difference :)
I find myself tending to save the majority of my images (in
terms of
developin
On 02/16/2012 05:25 PM, Burnie West wrote:
> On 02/16/2012 01:54 PM, Frank Gore wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Xiella
>> Harksell wrote:
>>> As a point of difference :)
>>>
>>> I find myself tending to save the majority of my images (in
>>> terms of
>>> developing the site - stripes, d
On 02/16/2012 01:54 PM, Frank Gore wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Xiella Harksell wrote:
As a point of difference :)
I find myself tending to save the majority of my images (in terms of
developing the site - stripes, decorations, non-content stuff) as
PNGs.
You're not the only one, t
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Xiella Harksell wrote:
> As a point of difference :)
>
> I find myself tending to save the majority of my images (in terms of
> developing the site - stripes, decorations, non-content stuff) as
> PNGs.
You're not the only one, the vast majority of professional web
On 17 February 2012 09:55, Steve Kinney wrote:
> PNG is a lossless format, so unless you are saving a lot of giant
> images and run short of time, there is no reason to dial back the
> compression from the default "9".
>
> On 02/16/2012 03:18 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
>
> > I am looking to create so
Very useful information. I'm in the habit of just pressing enter twice
to export. :)
I've always wondered what this stuff does, so this has been an
interesting read.
-Stefan Maerz
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> Others may know uses for png that I am not aware of, but so far I
> have found no use for it in web design.
PNG is quite useful for some effects. Say I wanted a div element to
have a gradient background - I could create a new image that's 1p
On 02/16/2012 03:18 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
> Hey all. I would hope this might get some responses...
>
> I just today saved my first png file.
> In doing so Gimp came up with a choice box, as to parameters you can choose
> or not:
>
> Interlacing (Adam7) (whatever that is)
> Save background color
>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Daniel Smith wrote:
> What does Adam7 mean?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam7_algorithm
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.or
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
> Hey all. I would hope this might get some responses...
>
> I just today saved my first png file.
> In doing so Gimp came up with a choice box, as to parameters you can choose
> or not:
>
> Interlacing (Adam7) (whatever that is)
> Save backgrou
Hey all. I would hope this might get some responses...
I just today saved my first png file.
In doing so Gimp came up with a choice box, as to parameters you can choose
or not:
Interlacing (Adam7) (whatever that is)
Save background color
Save gamma
Save layer offset
Save resolution
Save creation
18 matches
Mail list logo
