In a sense it may.
Thanks.
>Original Message
>From: si...@budig.de
>Date: 01/02/2016 11:17
>To:
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] A better way to close a path where an end node
is on top of a start node
>
>uga...@talktalk.net (uga...@talktalk.net) wrote:
>> Simon - I
On 01/02/16 12:23, Simon Budig wrote:
But the closepath-optimization is in the older gimp versions available
as well and should work the same for you.
Yes it does. Good to know.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:
Simon - I don't see how this will work in the scenario described.
>Original Message
>From: si...@budig.de
>Date: 31/01/2016 23:27
>To:
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] A better way to close a path where an end node
is on top of a start node
>
>Ofnuts (ofn...@gmx.com)
Simon Budig (si...@budig.de) wrote:
> uga...@talktalk.net (uga...@talktalk.net) wrote:
> > Simon - I don't see how this will work in the scenario described.
>
> We're talking about programmatically constructing a stroke within a
> vectors object, that has its end node placed on the start node and
uga...@talktalk.net (uga...@talktalk.net) wrote:
> Simon - I don't see how this will work in the scenario described.
We're talking about programmatically constructing a stroke within a
vectors object, that has its end node placed on the start node and then
is supposed to be closed. right?
I
Ofnuts (ofn...@gmx.com) wrote:
> If you are doing this in a script:
>
> * copy the backwards tangent of the last node to the first node
> * drop the last node and its tangent handles
> * mark the stroke closed
or use gimp_vectors_stroke_close.
Bye,
Simon
--
On 29/01/16 14:53, ugajin wrote:
I have been searching for how best to close a path where an end node is on top
of a start node.
One work-around is to not place the end node on the start node, so that the
path can be closed in the usual way, and then move what had been intended to be
the end