Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-09-01 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 7:32 PM, PSCS5ImagerConvert wrote:
 --REVISED INITIAL POST-- {As of Sunday, September 1, 2013}

Still not human-readable. We already know you are frustrated, no need
to repeat that. Try explaining in short sentences what you are trying
to achieve and what you see  instead. Like this:

1. I need to do [description of action]
2. I do [first step]
3. I do [second step]
4. I do [X=1 step]
5. Instead I see [pronlem description]

Alexandre
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-09-01 Thread Gary Aitken
That was pretty difficult to get a handle on.
Is this what you're looking for:

Windows/Dockable Dialogs/Layers  (ctlL)
2nd thing down is an Opacity slider.

Are you looking for a way to select a specific layer and operate on it 
using the Opacity slider via the keyboard?
Or just find the slider in the first place?

Gary
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-31 Thread yahvuu
Am 31.08.2013 00:56, schrieb Richard Gitschlag:
 Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:48:39 +0200
 From: ofn...@laposte.net
 Next these pesky users will also want to know the blend mode and locks 
 for that layer or group... could all this be displayed when hovering the 
 pointer over the layer thumbnail?
 
 That sounds like a decent idea:  Hover the mouse over a layer and it will pop 
 up a tooltip identifying the two things you can't tell from a glance - the 
 layer's blending mode and opacity.

or one step closer to the action -- what about providing such adjustments 
directly on canvas?


-peter


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-31 Thread Ofnuts

On 08/31/2013 11:53 AM, yahvuu wrote:

Am 31.08.2013 00:56, schrieb Richard Gitschlag:

Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:48:39 +0200
From: ofn...@laposte.net
Next these pesky users will also want to know the blend mode and locks
for that layer or group... could all this be displayed when hovering the
pointer over the layer thumbnail?

That sounds like a decent idea:  Hover the mouse over a layer and it will pop 
up a tooltip identifying the two things you can't tell from a glance - the 
layer's blending mode and opacity.

or one step closer to the action -- what about providing such adjustments 
directly on canvas?


How would you identify a layer on the canvas? The topmost 
non-transparent one (like the Move tool uses)?

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-31 Thread yahvuu
Am 31.08.2013 12:21, schrieb Ofnuts:
 How would you identify a layer on the canvas? The topmost 
 non-transparent one (like the Move tool uses)?

that's a tough question. And where to set the opacity threshold when choosing 
from multiple layers
that contribute to the pixel under the cursor?

Things become worse with blend modes like multiply, when there is no way to 
determine which layer is
on top just by looking at the canvas. For example, a bottom black layer can 
appear as if it were on
top of a multiply-mode layer:
http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/canvas-visible-order.png


On the solutions side, it has been suggested to tilt the canvas in 3D to make 
the layer stack
accessible:
http://gimp-brainstorm.blogspot.de/2008/06/3d-layers.html
This scheme works surprisingly well for analysing the hierarchical structure of 
HTML documents:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/3D_View#Controlling_the_3D_view

One might also think of digging into the layer stack analogous to digging into 
the earth which
reveals the stratigraphy of rock layers.


just brainstorming,
peter







___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-31 Thread Dominik Tabisz
3D view could be a solution for powerfull PC, not for too big image
on too little ram.

Would it be possible to use one program with many UIs? Let's say i
start GIMP and can switch between single window mode, multiple window
mode. Within each of this mode there could be next switch to see
content in normal structure or 3D view.

It reminds ideas like 3D goopher or Compiz - nice shiny toy to hang
computer. Gimp is image editing software - it operate on files that
need lot of ram. All this 3D features would just add another demands
for hardware. At least leave an option to disable them.
Otherwise we might end up with insane paradox: Apple workstation and
Photoshop CS 666 will be cheaper option than hardware capable of
running Gimp 6.66

I don't want to offend anyone - just trying to remind You, that every
feature has its cost - no matter whether we count it in hardware
resources or in money. If You manage to create additional alternative
UI for Gimp - great, if You make normal Gimp more expensive just to
get few visible clues - this is controversial.

Dominik Tabisz

2013/8/31, yahvuu yah...@gmail.com:
 Am 31.08.2013 12:21, schrieb Ofnuts:
 How would you identify a layer on the canvas? The topmost
 non-transparent one (like the Move tool uses)?

 that's a tough question. And where to set the opacity threshold when
 choosing from multiple layers
 that contribute to the pixel under the cursor?

 Things become worse with blend modes like multiply, when there is no way to
 determine which layer is
 on top just by looking at the canvas. For example, a bottom black layer can
 appear as if it were on
 top of a multiply-mode layer:
 http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/canvas-visible-order.png


 On the solutions side, it has been suggested to tilt the canvas in 3D to
 make the layer stack
 accessible:
 http://gimp-brainstorm.blogspot.de/2008/06/3d-layers.html
 This scheme works surprisingly well for analysing the hierarchical structure
 of HTML documents:
 https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/3D_View#Controlling_the_3D_view

 One might also think of digging into the layer stack analogous to digging
 into the earth which
 reveals the stratigraphy of rock layers.


 just brainstorming,
 peter







 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list



-- 
Dominik Tabisz
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-31 Thread Ofnuts

On 08/31/2013 01:13 PM, yahvuu wrote:

Am 31.08.2013 12:21, schrieb Ofnuts:

How would you identify a layer on the canvas? The topmost
non-transparent one (like the Move tool uses)?

that's a tough question. And where to set the opacity threshold when choosing 
from multiple layers
that contribute to the pixel under the cursor?

Things become worse with blend modes like multiply, when there is no way to 
determine which layer is
on top just by looking at the canvas. For example, a bottom black layer can 
appear as if it were on
top of a multiply-mode layer:
http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/canvas-visible-order.png


On the solutions side, it has been suggested to tilt the canvas in 3D to make 
the layer stack
accessible:
On the other hand the Layers stack is already accessible in the Layers 
list...

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Michael Natterer
TL;DR

Can you please say the same again, in a few readable sentences?

What is broken/missing?

On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 23:26 +0200, PSCS5ImagerConvert wrote:
 GIMP: Opacity Access Obscurity
   
 I. Would-be Satisfied User Question   
   
  
   
 II. System Feature Access Change Request | Recommendation, for GIMP SMEs and
 Online Enthusiasts' Forum:
 Maddening | Urgent Help Request:  
   
 I. Apparent is no navigational work-around for a lost, deleted (or simply no
 included/provided) Layer Opacity access feature ... at least in my version of
 GIMP v. 2.8.6; ie, I cannot locate among the application's Primary tabs any
 tab/sub-tab/path/palette link/hot button/menu/sub-menu/relevant-other-tab/data
 entry field prompt | window/mini-portal, to a much desired
 {ASIDE 1 of 2: albeit often one such Layer Opacity tool is readily referenced 
 in
 several of the extant online tutorials  as a given, and it is, too, 
 often
 depicted, replete with a supporting screenshot, no less: so the feature must
 exist  perhaps commanded by hidden access privilege(s) somehow, somewhere
 within GIMP ... for some users, at least ;-)}:
 GIMP | GUI  Other Layer Opacity Access Priority Change Recommendations:  
   
 Primary Layer tab's, anticipated, Layer Opacity tool/option
 tab/sub-tab/path/palette link/hot button/menu/sub-menu/relevant-other-tab/data
 entry field prompt | window/mini-portal or the like access point(s) is not
 found.
 Its (such a Layer Opacity tool/option's form-factor would be manifest 
 typically
 as an Opacity Glider aka a selectable |adjustable progress bar; nor, for that
 matter, is there evidence of any semblance of a percentage (%) transparency
 scroll bar nor an expectable like prompt data-entry field, of any description,
 which conceivably would execute a layer's desired fade user-specification
 (opacity) aka a amiss is any Layer Opacity adjustment tool (if such does in
 fact already exist) access point(s), whatsoever.
 Despite CIRCULAR narratives communicated on this, GIMP's official site, and
 among the posts of those others created by or in service to | contributed to 
 by
 GIMP enthusiasts, there exists no CLEAR nor MEANINGFUL ADDRESS as to how one
 MAKES APPARENT aka would ACCESS ie, access point(s) for Layer Opacity: neither
 by mouse clicking nor by eg, shortcut keys entry navigation/specification, for
 such a Layer Opacity tool access point(s).
 II. Again, when no such tab/sub-tab/path/palette link/hot
 button/menu/sub-menu/relevant-other-tab/data entry field prompt |
 window/mini-portal can be readily found to exist among one -- and ideally in
 more than one -- access point and by more than one navigational path -- GIMP's
 version (again, v. 2.8.6) is rendered effectively useless for layered imagery
 work; user satisfaction spirals downward rapidly after a work-around search --
 proves counter-intuitive ie, poor anticipatory GUI provisioning, or within the
 application ie, its Help and/or its User Guide index, and/or among online 
 forums
 -- exceeds 5, 10, 30, 60, 120 minutes.
 FIASCO is what that scenario spells: Why could GIMP's SMEs have failed on such
 an imperative SDLC GUI, indexing and easy-access multi-cross-referencing
 point(s) objective for this version's release?
 And what, if any, work-around, for Layer Opacity tool access point(s) within 
 the
 application, for selection of a layer(s) desired opacity display aka fade 
 level,
 would be advised, if, in fact, said does exist as a viable tool (just not 
 easily
 nor readily accessed) within GIMP 2.8.6? Why the Layer Opacity access point(s)
 convolution?
 Welcomed would be directions as to any navigation(al) path for said Layer
 Opacity tool access point(s). NONE is (access point) | are (access points)
 currently apparent under GIMP's 2.8.6 banner | top-level ribbon | panel of
 Primary Tabs, nor is such evident within its sub-tabs nor User Guide's Index 
 nor
 tutorials nor blogosphere.
 {ASIDE 2 of 2: in fact, Layer Opacity should appear in, so addressed, in both
 the very beginning of the User Guide, and then latter in the specific Layers
 section  but in a more detailed explication, within the latter] nor those
 tabs' secondary tabs, nor, for that matter under any tertiary-level tabs.
 Primary Tabs, namely, Tools, Layer, View nor any their cross-linked sub-tabs
 to other tab/sub-tab/path/palette link/hot
 button/menu/sub-menu/relevant-other-tab/data entry field prompt |
 window/mini-portal | option(s) | location(s) avails a sort of Layer Opacity
 Adjustment tool, whatsoever.}
 Lack of any easy-access point(s) aka obscure Layer Opacity (eg, a % glider)
 tool(s) blemishes one's entire would-be GIMP user-experience. Address of said
 shortcomings is URGENTLY needed, as recommended.
 Again the question persists: Is 

Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Burnie West

On 08/30/2013 12:16 AM, Michael Natterer wrote:

TL;DR

Can you please say the same again, in a few readable sentences?

What is broken/missing?

On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 23:26 +0200, PSCS5ImagerConvert wrote:

GIMP: Opacity Access Obscurity

I think the OP is concerned because the opacity slider does not affect the 
active layer.


I tried to adjust opacity of a filled layer by changing the slider but could 
never manage to see anything of the layer below. Seems like I could before 2.8.6 
but I don't use it much so I don't recall well.


Bucket fill of a region works reasonably; that's what I've used more often.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Kevin Payne
I think I've deciphered  your request and please correct me if I'm wrong 
(preferably in a concise way), but you are saying that you don't have an 
Opacity slider in your Layers dialog? 
http://docs.gimp.org/2.8/en/gimp-dialogs-structure.html#gimp-layer-dialog

You've met one requirement for requesting help by specifying the version of 
GIMP that you are using, but have failed to meet the requirement to inform us 
of the operating system that you are using. Please do so as it may be a 
significant factor in finding the remedy for your problem.

Regards

Kevin




 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:26:15 +0200
 From: for...@gimpusers.com
 To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 CC: t...@gimpusers.com
 Subject: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness
 
 GIMP: Opacity Access Obscurity
   
 I. Would-be Satisfied User Question   
   
  
   
 II. System Feature Access Change Request | Recommendation, for GIMP SMEs and
 Online Enthusiasts' Forum:
 Maddening | Urgent Help Request:  
   
 I. Apparent is no navigational work-around for a lost, deleted (or simply no

 PSCS5ImagerConvert (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
  
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Michael Natterer
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 00:58 -0700, Burnie West wrote:
 On 08/30/2013 12:16 AM, Michael Natterer wrote:
  TL;DR
 
  Can you please say the same again, in a few readable sentences?
 
  What is broken/missing?
 
  On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 23:26 +0200, PSCS5ImagerConvert wrote:
  GIMP: Opacity Access Obscurity
  
 I think the OP is concerned because the opacity slider does not affect the 
 active layer.
 
 I tried to adjust opacity of a filled layer by changing the slider but could 
 never manage to see anything of the layer below. Seems like I could before 
 2.8.6 
 but I don't use it much so I don't recall well.

Seem to work fine here, and I think we would have heard it already if
such an important control was broken. I really don't know what this
is about.

--Mitch


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Ofnuts

On 08/29/2013 11:26 PM, PSCS5ImagerConvert wrote:

GIMP: Opacity Access Obscurity
I. Would-be Satisfied User Question

II. System Feature Access Change Request | Recommendation, for GIMP SMEs and
Online Enthusiasts' Forum:
Maddening | Urgent Help Request:


[ ... snippage ... ]
   


TL;DR...

Are you taking about this? http://i.imgur.com/ECJVe4q.png




___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Michael Schumacher
 Gesendet: Freitag, 30. August 2013 um 09:16 Uhr
 Von: Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org

 TL;DR
 
 Can you please say the same again, in a few readable sentences?

For the records: 

I've discarded that mail as a failed spam attempt - lots of copypasted text 
with enough keywords mixed in to make it seem on-topic :)


-- 
Regards,
Michael
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 12:22 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:

  I think the OP is concerned because the opacity slider does not affect the 
  active layer.

It does.

The UI would be massively clearer if the opacity slider was moved down
under the other layer-specific controls and maybe under the list of
layers, or under the actual layer name - it's not obvious today that the
opacity slider applies to the layer selected in the list beneath it.

That's my best guess at why someone might not find it - I've heard
people having difficulty with that before.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
 On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 12:22 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:

  I think the OP is concerned because the opacity slider does not affect the
  active layer.

 It does.

 The UI would be massively clearer if the opacity slider was moved down
 under the other layer-specific controls and maybe under the list of
 layers, or under the actual layer name - it's not obvious today that the
 opacity slider applies to the layer selected in the list beneath it.

IMO, this is worth thinking about. Right now it's not possible to have
an overlook of each layer's opacity. OTOH, one might argue a visible
slider for each layer would clutter UI.

Alexandre
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Richard Gitschlag
 Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:48:39 +0200
 From: ofn...@laposte.net
 To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness
 
 Next these pesky users will also want to know the blend mode and locks 
 for that layer or group... could all this be displayed when hovering the 
 pointer over the layer thumbnail?

That sounds like a decent idea:  Hover the mouse over a layer and it will pop 
up a tooltip identifying the two things you can't tell from a glance - the 
layer's blending mode and opacity.

-- Stratadrake
strata_ran...@hotmail.com

Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
  
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness

2013-08-30 Thread Brendan Scott

On 08/31/2013 05:28 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:

On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 12:22 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:


I think the OP is concerned because the opacity slider does not affect the
active layer.


It does.

The UI would be massively clearer if the opacity slider was moved down
under the other layer-specific controls and maybe under the list of
layers, or under the actual layer name - it's not obvious today that the
opacity slider applies to the layer selected in the list beneath it.


IMO, this is worth thinking about. Right now it's not possible to have
an overlook of each layer's opacity. OTOH, one might argue a visible
slider for each layer would clutter UI.


I think the opacity (display) widget should be a small (eg 10x2 or  20x4 pixel) 
progress bar for each layer.
While I'm at it, a lock widget could be a similarly small green (unlocked) or 
red (locked) round button. It doesn't need to actually look like a lock.

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list