Yes - that logo needs to be recreated (or found again) in vector
format - all these folks are correct.
I do want to throw out a trick though. It didn't work for your logo,
but you'd be surprised at how often it *does* work: reverse image
search:
http://www.tineye.com/search/925a0d00b7662176f504844
On 12/24/2015 06:03 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
On 12/24/2015 10:43 AM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:10:26 +0100, carvar wrote:
Ask whoever designed the logo to give you the original vector file.
Big help :)
I'm serious - the only way to "enhance" it is to redraw it, and it's
p
On 12/24/2015 10:43 AM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:10:26 +0100, carvar wrote:
>
>>> Ask whoever designed the logo to give you the original vector file.
>> Big help :)
>
> I'm serious - the only way to "enhance" it is to redraw it, and it's
> probably cheaper to just ask the d
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:10:26 +0100, carvar wrote:
>>Ask whoever designed the logo to give you the original vector file.
> Big help :)
I'm serious - the only way to "enhance" it is to redraw it, and it's
probably cheaper to just ask the designer for the original.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><><
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:33:07 +0100, carvar wrote:
> I need to enhance this attached logo for large print. The current quality is
> terrible.
Ask whoever designed the logo to give you the original vector file.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >