So, by looking at the help text, it seems that you used all the options suited
to focus stacking.
At least in the help file I'm looking at, I think the only option "for"
focus stacking is -m ? For lenses with focus breathing (i.e. almost all
lenses) if you are changing the focus for each
D'oh, the -d option! And -x -y -z sound promising as well. Not clear
what -i does -- doesn't it always optimize the center shift? Or does
"center shift" mean something more complex than simple x/y translation?
Thanks, Pat! Pays to RTFM. The hugin toolkit continues to amaze me.
That generates
Could I have another link to the images to test something?
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:59 PM oneaty wrote:
> >One last thought: if you are going to remove the barrel distortion in
> >those images, you might try removing it before doing the image
> >alignment... that might
One last thought: if you are going to remove the barrel distortion in
those images, you might try removing it before doing the image
alignment... that might allow align_image_stack to work better... -c
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:
Then I take the resulting output.tif file, open it in gimp, change the
precision to 8 or 16bit, and remove the alpha channel (right-click the
layer). This is the result of that process:
http://caseyconnor.org/pub/image/aligned_and_medianed.tif
It certainly looks very good!
However, it's not
Ok -- I believe PS is beating align_image_stack because the picture
seems to have been taken with a very wide lens (i.e. short focal length)
from close up... as a result, there is a lot of barrel distortion, and
in addition there is a lot of camera movement between frames, so the
result is
I tried
align_image_stack -a align -g 10 -t 5 *.tif
Did you try with a lower-than-default -g? E.g. "-g 3"?
If you want to upload the base .tif files somewhere, I can try to align
them, so we can see if there is some strange difference between
align_image_stack on our machines.
-c
Ah, ok. So what exactly goes wrong: one or two of the images is off-kilter?
If you specify -g, try using something besides the default, as I'm not
sure that using the default will change the behavior. (Meaning, not
specifying -g probably results in the same thing as just "-g" -- the
So, backing up a step: when you say align_image_stack doesn't work, what
do you mean exactly? I assumed you meant that it did a poor job aligning
the images, but I don't think the command lines you list there would
even work to start the program, so I'm wondering now if you meant that
it
Did you try the -g option with align_image_stack? Or -t?
I align hand-held images with align_image_stack and it works fine, even
without those options... e.g. this one:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lacinato/32628735771/in/dateposted-public/
-c
On 03/24/2017 12:58 PM, oneaty wrote:
Per
Align_image_stack is usually the best option other than possibly attempting
it manually directly in Hugin.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 8:57 PM Casey Connor
wrote:
> Hi - I was curious what the best overall image alignment plugin/method
> in GIMP (or out of GIMP) was
11 matches
Mail list logo