Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As was discussed at Gimp Con 2003 (and before, frankly) I am in the process of incorporating The GIMP Foundation as a non-profit organization devoted to supporting the gimp. Thanks a lot for organizing this. Here are some of the ideas I am

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-13-03 07:41]: On 13 Oct 2003 11:55:27 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Selling GIMP tee-shirts, manuals, CDs and other stuff may be interesting, but I would prefer to have this done by a company that would be a separate legal entity.

[Gimp-user] What happened to transparency after flatten?

2003-10-13 Thread Albert Wagner
I have several layered images developed for an animation. I built them using a white background for ease in drawing. All other layers were transparent. For each I then deleted the background layer, flattened the image, and saved as *.png. However, the flattened image still had a white background,

Re: [Gimp-user] What happened to transparency after flatten?

2003-10-13 Thread Albert Wagner
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:49:02 +0200 Marco Wessel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Ah! That does it. Thank you, Marco. -- Life is an offensive, directed against the repetitious mechanism of the Universe. --Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947) ___

Re: [Gimp-user] What happened to transparency after flatten?

2003-10-13 Thread Kevin Myers
Hi Marco - I've been working with some facets of digital images for a long time, but I still don't completely understand everything about transparency. In particular, you mention one of the things here that I am confused about. Could you please explain further exactly what transparency and alpha

Re: [Gimp-user] What happened to transparency after flatten?

2003-10-13 Thread Marco Wessel
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Kevin Myers wrote: Hi Marco - I've been working with some facets of digital images for a long time, but I still don't completely understand everything about transparency. In particular, you mention one of the things here that I am confused about.

Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Daniel Rogers
Sven Neumann wrote: This sounds a lot more like an attempt to bring WilberWorks Wilber what? I plead ignorant. back to life than what I was imaging from such a foundation. IMO it should be a lot less commercially oriented but maybe I am only getting a wrong impression from looking at this list.

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Daniel Rogers
Also, I fear my first email may have been a bit to rambling to be able to actually get my point across. What I am hoping to discover by encourging this conversation is what ways people would like to help with TGF and in what ways people would like to see TGF help them. I would also like to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On 13 Oct 2003 11:55:27 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As was discussed at Gimp Con 2003 (and before, frankly) I am in the process of incorporating The GIMP Foundation as a non-profit organization devoted to supporting the gimp.

[Gimp-user] GIMP 1.3 Reference Manuals

2003-10-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I sent a similar mail to the gimp-developer list last week but since there was no feedback I assume that our developers are all too busy to help with the documentation. So I am trying again here... One of the goals of current GIMP development is to make the code easier to read and

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Daniel Rogers
Carol Spears wrote: When I looked into this sometime back, I watched the gnome foundation elections on the irc. This is probably not the best view of a foundation, however, I really wanted nothing to do with it. We don't need to structure our Foundation (or even have membership) if we don't want

Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sven Neumann wrote: This sounds a lot more like an attempt to bring WilberWorks Wilber what? I plead ignorant. Oh well, one should really run one's own internet archive. The website seems bought off and of course not much is left to be found

Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Daniel Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Neumann wrote: | Thanks a lot for organizing this. you're welcome. - -- Dan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org