On Wed, 11 May 2011 18:15:42 -0500, Chris Mohler wrote: > And pngcrush might be able to shave off a few bytes afterward - I've > gotten mixed results myself, but if bandwidth is a huge concern it may > be worth a try.
After pngcrush, also process the image with AdvPNG (which is much faster, and sometimes achieves better compression than pngcrush) <http://advancemame.sourceforge.net/comp-readme.html> and PNGOUT but only if you have a lot of time) <http://www.advsys.net/ken/utils.htm>. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
