On 10/03/2010 12:02 PM, Norman Silverstone wrote:
On 03/10/2010 08:48 AM, Sandi P. wrote:
I appreciate you having a look at these. They are unedited, right from the
scanner. You can see them at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37318...@n04/
<snip>
Moreover, the samples here are so small that it is impossible to really
appreciate the quality and do anything useful. You should scan at 300dpi
at the very least.
I agree with the comments and would add that if you really want to
achieve the best possible than scan at 600dpi and take it from there.
Norman
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
I had the same problem as you, scanning more than a thousand family
photos and doing some restoration on each of them. When dealing with
photos that were on a textured paper, and I had a lot, I used a plugin
called 'GREYCstoration' to remove the texture.
It is a complicated plugin and I had to do a lot of experimentation to
produce acceptable results. But two details that I do remember at this
time was to scan at high enough resolution so the texture is well
defined, I recall 450 dpi in my case and do not use an unsharp mask
until the texture is removed.
The plugin has been part of and superseded by G'MIC from the same people
and can be obtained at
http://gmic.sourceforge.net/gimp.shtml
Look in the enhancement section
Good Luck
Lawrence
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
