On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:20:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some more perl-fu'ing (is there a specific perl-fu mailinglist?)
yes, see gimp.pages.de for details.
Is there anyway to test if a given is a valid gimp image file?
no, and gimp can crash if you feed it garbage. not that often
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:14:02PM -0500, John Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone provide a service to this list of filtering out the spam? the
volume is not large but it is annoying. My other lists seem spam-free.
I think spam filtering is basically an end-user problem. There is
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:04:32PM -0500, Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think spam filtering is basically an end-user problem. There is no way
to make lists spam-free, so not large seems fine to me.
You can, by only permitting subscribers to post to the list, which many
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 12:03:14AM +, As Signed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could anyone please help me get a perl script invoked from HTML
via the local server run Gimp?
Run the script with -v to see gimp's error message. Protocol error 1 most
probably means that gimp couldn't start. Most
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:53:39AM -1000, Denis McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tried it on a friend's computer and apart from CMYK conversion and print
preparation it has virtually nothing The Gimp can't do. In the end I bought
Somebody please step forward and implement cheap CMYK
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:28:17PM -0500, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At what point is it better to use The GIMP for batch processing over
For one, whenever you want to interactively adjust sth. ImageMagick is a
blind flight, with gimp you can more easily change
First of all, please don't quote such a long mail without replying to
it. Believe us, we _did_ reeceive the original mail, too ;)
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:26:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*) How does the Xtns/Script-Fu menu differ from the Script-Fu
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 01:35:58AM -0800, Joshua Thorin Messer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, wait when you wrote Currently browsers do not support PNG
widely enough to use PNG instead you might have meant Currently
The striking majority of browsers, not only IE on Windows. And PNG can't
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 11:23:38PM +1300, Thomi Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The striking majority of browsers, not only IE on Windows. And PNG
can't do animations, which are very important. So GIF will need to
stay around for some time :(
which ones exactly? as stated before,
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 11:35:38AM -0500, PL O'Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually PNG does do animations and they are called MNG.
Actually PNG does NOT do animations, and it's not called MNG ;)
Both tiff and jpeg can store jpeg-like and losless images, they are still
different. MNG and PNG
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 07:04:42PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
convert sourcefile -filter mitchell -geometry newgeometry destfile
ok, I tried thisand I got an image that was not up to par with what can be
done with Adobe's Image ready doing a similiar process. However, with
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:52:18AM -0600, Kevin Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that perhaps this can be accomplished with ImageMagick, but I don't
seem to be able to figure out the proper command line parameters.
Well, you can't do it with ImageMagick ;) It does read the image in,
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 08:46:22PM -0600, Greg Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
problems. It appears that someone already has the same issues I have
with running Script-Fu from perl (just like the tutorials said I would),
but I am wondering if it applies to just scheme based script fu, or
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 12:58:12PM +0200, Matthias Brunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we have a lot of document scans, all sized 2432x3482 pixels, and
and which colour depth?
The problem is that the standard scale algorithm renders the document
unreadable (some text characters can still be
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 05:00:42PM -0500, Gebhart, Mark A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
installed; however, I can do a rlogin to a machine on the network that
does have gimp. It freezes on my everytime I try to take the
screenshot. Has anyone had luck doing a screenshot over a remote
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:24:53AM -0700, A Guy Called Tyketto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you run ./configure --help, you'll see an option for --disable-perl. The
perl extentions for Gimp-Perl are enabled by default. so If you don't have
Gimp-Perl installed, ./configure will blow up. do a
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:08:03PM +0200, Mariusz Sapinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LZW compression in not available due to Unisys pattern enforcement
I have'n enforced any Unisys pattern? What's going on? How to repair it?
That should read patent instead of pattern. I am not sure wether
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:31:56PM +0200, Mariusz Sapinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What surprises me is that among the 60 files i have to work on, i succeed
with more than 40, and then i've met the problem. Another problem is
that with the rest of the files, even if i choose Save As option,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:36:39PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are only making things worse if you convert from RGB to CMYK
Not really... people I talked to said they can perfectly handle that
(adjusting colours later in a layout program for example, or simply addign
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:08:05PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i need a script to convert x amount of png files into a single xcf
file, is that possible ?
Writing that script in Script-Fu or Gimp-Perl should be trivial.
It might also work to just use a current version of
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:14:53PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just new to script-fu and gimp. I was not aware scheme is used for
scripting in gimp. I loved that. :D Anyway, I've read the script-fu
part of the gimp manual. I have a directory tree with about 1000
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:44:11PM -0500, Michael Dingwall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subroutine Gimp::gimp_file_load redefined at /(path to Gimp.pm/Gimp.pm on line
This is probably a bug in gimp-perl with the compatibility syntax. Could
you try to use object-oriented syntax, i.e.
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:00:53PM -0500, Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not after circles. I'm even lines radiating from the center.
Did you see the gif link above? Just like that minus the circle in the
You could create a striped gradient fiurst and then use the gradient
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:33:31PM -0400, Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh no, you missed the issue. It was not about a whitespace, it was about
creating a NEWLINE.
There was a whole blank line BELOW the image.
Unless... a whitespace could somehow create that newline... maybe
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:09:32PM -0500, Michael J. Hammel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86, Apache, and others all formed boards and/or non-profits to help
deal with the situation. I believe its time the GIMP community
seriously considered this as well.
We should also consider that xfree86
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:40:12PM -0700, Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with as well - how to take a loosely organized group and work with
outside, commercial groups who have more strict rules for interaction.
XFree86, Apache, and others all formed boards and/or non-profits to help
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:33:39AM -0500, Michael J. Hammel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should also consider that xfree86 currently falls aparts exactly
because of the board (and wrecks for quite some time already).
I received this, and, since it's probably meant for a larger
forum, forwarded it to the gimp-user mailinglist,
- Forwarded message from Nq6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Nq6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:54:05 -0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:40:23AM +, david [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second is proving trickier. The second dependency is a perl file
called file::Slurp. Last night I cpan'ed the file. I thought
No matter how often you download and install File::Slurp, rpm won't take
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 10:44:28PM -0600, Timothy Jedlicka bonzopad [EMAIL
1. Is a setting of 1 truly equal to a lossless jpg?
2. Is file size the only reason not to use quality=1. It still seems like a
bargain compared to tif file size.
I think so, too, but it's
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 01:16:57PM +, Dave selby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Debian compiles for a i386 I have a PIII I have re-compiled
Gimp, cupsys-driver-gimpprint libgimpprint1. To my supprise this has
made no difference.
You can expect a 3-20% performance increase even in good
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xvfb. Additionally, I created two init.d scripts to automate the
start/stop of Xvfb and GIMP's Perl Server at start-up/shutdown. Both
scripts work great when executed manually, but when actually power
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:34:07PM +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and reconfiguration, for example assign some F# keys to some Filters
that are going to be used a lot in a row, but probably not in next
work session or image.
I am fully aware of this since I use this feature
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:12:10PM -0600, Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, would you consider removing ESC as a binding to pop you out of
full-screen mode? I think F11 is a sufficient (and common) toggle for
Well, ESC has a very low probability of being remapped by e.g. a window
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 01:26:09PM +0100, GSR - FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what people is used to or the levels for typical images and finaly get
my patch encouragingly classified as evil, I think I will stop wasting
time and keep my ideas and suggestions to myself.
Get used to it, that's how
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 05:24:51PM +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
Get used to it, that's how gimp-developer works :(
Marc, your comment is highly inappropriate.
Eh, really? Yes, maybe I should have said that's how gimp
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 12:43:18PM -0700, Steve Strobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried using the perspective transform to adjust the corners of the image so the
section lines would be horizontal and vertical.
That's actually correctly doing what the perspective transform is doing
Yours ID chigeck
Gimp-user mailing list
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:50:39PM +1000, David Burren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am curious. do you think that if the adobe geniuses could make their
software compile on linux, if it would slow it down.
No. In fact they've got it to compile on a Unix (ie. MacOS X) and
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:14:38AM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason for this, i.e.:
- Is tif/lzw compression excluded from gimp or only from the debian
only from de debian build.
(some others, too, what you meant was not from the original
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:08:30AM +0100, Colin Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got further with installation of GIMP 2 on Solaris, but have hit
a problem in the Gtk installation, message included below.
Once again, is anyone using GIMP 2 on Solaris ?
I have no idea :)
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:13:51AM -0800, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:55:16AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:32:06PM -0800, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to do it in a was compatible to gimp.
okay. and i
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 05:59:29PM +0800, steve hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will be pleased to know the GIMP is making handsome profits for this
eBay pirate with no reference to the real name:
It might shock you, but it's completey legal, at least in most jurisdictions.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:02:31PM +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL
Could it be done via additional menu item: open for the lossless
transformations with only few operations active? The operation itself
has sense for digital images with portrait orientation. It would be
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL
I'ts not that uncommon for a mailing list to have a queue time of one or two
And even weeks...
This, however, can't be considered normal. IIRC, the mailing list system is
slow, but not that slow.
Mail list logo